You say that "we cannot afford to look at different points of view".
Do you mean looking from other than a food safety perspective or do you mean lock into one food safety system. Or perhaps something else?
Vanessa Broadnax <vanessa@baldorfood.com> wrote: Sometimes more is good. We need to keep food safety in the forefront. We can not afford not to look at different points of view. Different views keeps us on our toes. We must manage our time and efforts wisely.
----- Original Message -----
From: owner-seafood@ucdavis.edu
To: seafood@ucdavis.edu
Sent: Thu Aug 09 19:57:07 2007
Subject: Auditing Quality Systems
I seem to spend a lot of time being accredited to one quality system or another and then meeting with Processors who complain that there are so many systems that they have to become documenters for each system with differing needs.
Any comments on relative merits of the differing systems ?
(without especially trashing systems by name)
My two cents, for what it is worth, is that ISO 22000 will probably replace everything else eventually. ( it has HACCP components so is on-topic)
Other views anyone?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 11 2007 - 11:51:18 PDT