RE: Rigor mortis

From: Otwell,Walter S (otwell@ufl.edu)
Date: Thu May 03 2007 - 10:25:05 PDT

  • Next message: MILTON BRICENO: "Ebola like virus killing fish in great lakes"

    This explanation is on target, plus there could be possible negative influences due to product dehydration. Proper use of phosphates could help protect moisture content during frozen storage and thawing, and cooking. The dominate component in the cod is water. The product water or moisture is the natural lubricant to minimize tough texture, plus it carries the essential flavors and nutrients.

     

    From: owner-seafood@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-seafood@ucdavis.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew Strak
    Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 12:12 PM
    To: Steve_Lamming@youngsbluecrest.com; seafood@ucdavis.edu
    Subject: RE: Rigor mortis

     

    It is probably formaldehyde, as Tom G. stated in the earlier follow-up. Apparently at freezing TMAO undergoes the following chemical change: TMAO à DMA + FA. But the enzymes appear instrumental for this reaction to take place since there are some species quite high in TMAO but without that FA build-up and resultant toughening. The problem may be further exacerbated if there are reducing conditions in the flesh resulting in oxygen depletion (vacuum packing or ascorbates). Those reducing conditions may be also created by the nucleotide reactions and this may bring this association to the rigor mortis states.

     

    Andrew

     

    ________________________________

    From: owner-seafood@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-seafood@ucdavis.edu] On Behalf Of Steve_Lamming@youngsbluecrest.com
    Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 5:38 AM
    To: seafood@ucdavis.edu
    Subject: Rigor mortis

     

    Dear all,
    I am experiencing a real textural problem (toughness) in Pacific Cod which is more pronounced in fish <2kg, and is even more pronounced in twice frozen products produced from such fish.
    However, fillets sold in chilled form appear to be consistently good quality, regardless of the size or age of the H&G fish from which they originate (up to 1 year old H&G that is).
    My out take from this is that obviously the larger the fish the longer it will take to go through rigor, and with twice frozen product, processed quickly, the muscle may still not have gone through rigor before refreezing.
    On the other hand, fillets sold in chilled form will be defrosted for at least 24 hours before retail sale, in which case rigor is likely to have passed, hence the satisfactory texture.

    Does any have a view on the time/temperature relationship required for completion of rigor in fish such as Pacific Cod?

    Is there any analytical technique for determining pre-rigor, rigor, post-rigor condition?

    Thanks in anticipation of your help on this one.
    Best regards,
    Steve

    ****************************************************************************
    This email and any attachments are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. They may contain material protected by legal, professional or other privilege.
    If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, you are not authorised to and must not disclose, copy, distribute or retain this email or its attachments.
    Unless stated to the contrary, any opinions expressed in this message are those of the individual and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. Although this email and its attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the Company for any loss or damage arising from receipt or use thereof.

    Young's Seafood Ltd.
    Registered in England No. 3628503
    Registered Office: Ross House, Wickham Road, Grimsby, DN31 3SW
    VAT No. GB 716529721

    http://www.youngsseafood.co.uk <http://www.youngsseafood.co.uk/> http://www.macrae.co.uk <http://www.macrae.co.uk/>

    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

    The information in this message is intended only for the addressee or the addressee's authorized agent. The message may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the recipient's authorized agent, then you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please reply to the sender and then delete the message.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 03 2007 - 10:27:06 PDT