RE: Use of E450 in fishery products

From: Foodfocus (info@foodfocus.nl)
Date: Wed Mar 28 2007 - 13:26:33 PDT

  • Next message: alaugo: "Res: RE: Use of E450 in fishery products"

    [Having seen the reactions to "E450" I believe that somewhere my reaction got lost]

    Peter is right.

    Anyway: the EU inspector was wrong.

    About Peter's remark on 'latest version': allways download the consolidated (CONSLEG)
    legislation (however not official - but from there you may consider downloading the Official
    Journal's texts).

    see: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm select [simple search] and on the next page:
    [consolidated text], and fill in for Directive [1995] & [2].

    The direct link is in my message to Chella Rao.

    I copy in my e-mail here:

    ========= START ==========

    Dear Chella Rao

    The inspector and you should have read this beforehand  ...

    download the directive:

    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/consleg/1995/L/01995L0002-20060815-en.pdf

    then goto page 35 and read

    " In the following applications the indicated maximum levels of
    phosphoric acid and the phosphates E 338, E 339, E 340, E 341,
    E 343, E 450, E 451 and E 452 may be added individually or
    in combination (expressed as P2O5): "

    read further on page 36 about seafood.

    For exporters:

    Note that it is possible that in specific EU countries the implementation of a DIRECTIVE
    might slightly differ from the directive's exact text. This is because a Directive is a
    'guideline' in contrast to a Regulation which is by definition equal in each member state.

    =============== END =============

    Sincerely

    Jan

    On 28 Mar 2007 at 20:20, P Howgate wrote:

    > I don't believe that Alex Gonçalves' interpretation of EU Directive 95/2 is
    > correct. Laura Garrido has already explained that the listings in Annexe IV
    > of the Directive are not to be read horizontally and the way Alex has
    > presented them in his message is misleading and not how the Directive
    > presents the situation. It is quite clear to me that in Annexe IV that the E
    > numbers, 450, 451, & 452, the chemical compounds relating to these numbers,
    > and the foods they can be used in should be read as a single block within
    > the first 3 columns. It does not make sense otherwise. What should be read
    > horizontally is the food type listed in column 3 and the permitted maximum
    > concentration of added phosphate in column 4. It might be that the
    > presentation is the Directive could be clearer, but I have never found that
    > EU regulations are clearly explained or presented. I think you are expected
    > to know the purpose of the regulation and apply it without a pedantic
    > interpretation of the wording. Phosphates are added to foods for a variety
    > of purposes and the purposes are not the same for different classes of
    > foods. For example, diphosphates, E450, are used mainly as acidity
    > correctors/buffers and to some extents as complexing agents and I am not
    > sure if they are used in any processed fishery product. Triphosphates, E451,
    > and polyphosphates, E452, are added to many processed fishery products,
    > fresh, frozen and canned, as water retention agents which are listed in
    > column 3 of the Annexe. (Canned crustacean products are listed, but not
    > canned fish products. I think this is more probably an oversight on the part
    > of the drafters of the regulation rather than a desire to forbid the use of
    > polyphosphates in canned fish). They are used in meat products for the same
    > purpose and the meat products are listed near the top of column 3, opposite
    > E340 and a horizontal reading of the columns would suggest that
    > polyphosphates may not be used in meat products, which is not the case.
    > Analytically it is not easy to demonstrate that polyphosphates, as distinct
    > from orthophosphates, have been added to a fishery product because studies
    > have shown that tripolyphosphate is quite rapidly hydrolysed to
    > orthophosphate in fish muscle.
    >
    > Anyone consulting the wording of the Directive should check that it is the
    > latest version. I have among my papers a copy of 95/2 copied from the
    > Official Journal of the European Communities, L61, of 18/3/95 and there are
    > minor differences between this and the version on the EU Internet site at
    > http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sfp/addit_flavor/flav11_en.pdf. For example, the
    > list in the OJ publication of 1995 does not include canned crustacean
    > products and unprocessed and processed molluscs which are included in the
    > Internet version.
    >
    > Peter Howgate
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Alex Augusto Gonçalves" <alaugo@terra.com.br>
    > To: "Chella Rao Grandhi." <gvrchella@gmail.com>; <seafood@ucdavis.edu>;
    > "GarridoLaura M" <shrimp@ufl.edu>
    > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:35 PM
    > Subject: Res: RE: Use of E450 in fishery products
    >
    >
    > Dear Laura, Chella and others colleagues,
    >
    > I'm not agree with you: E450 is not allowed for fish and/or fish products
    > (according to EU Directive 95/2/EC):
    >
    > ANNEX IV - OTHER PERMITTED ADDITIVES
    >
    > The maximum levels of use indicated refer to foodstuffs ready for
    > consumption prepared following manufacturers' instructions.
    >
    > See Page 35:
    >
    > In the following applications the indicated maximum levels of phosphoric
    > acid and the phosphates E 338, E 339, E 340, E 341, E 343, E 450, E 451 and
    > E 452 May be added individually or in combination (expressed as P2O5):
    >
    > ENoNameFoodstuffMaximum level
    > E 450DiphosphatesSauces5 g/kg
    > Disodium diphosphateSoups and broths3 g/kg
    > Trisodium diphosphateInstant tea and instant herbal infusions2 g/kg
    > Tetrasodium diphosphateCider and Perry2 g/l
    > Tétrapotassium phosphateChewing-gumq.s.
    > Dried powdered foodstuffs10 g/kg
    > Dicalcium diphosphateChocolate and malt dairy-based drinks2 g/l
    > Calcium dihydrogen diphosphateAlcoholic drinks (excluding wine and beer)1
    > g/l
    > Breakfast cereals5 g/kg
    > Snacks5 g/kg
    >
    >
    > The E 451 (I, ii, iv) are used (applied/allowed) to surimi, fish and
    > crustacean paste, fish fillets..
    >
    > I'm very confused because this directive show us some phosphates, but
    > individually E450 is not applied to seafood (only E451).
    >
    > Maybe added in combination, but in which level?? (0.1; 0.5 or 1%)??
    >
    > All the best,
    > __________________________________________
    > Prof. Dr. Alex Augusto Gonçalves (alaugo@terra.com.br)
    > Food Engineering Course - UNISINOS (alexg@unisinos.br)
    > Gastronomy Course Coordinator - UNISINOS
    > Master in Food Engineering
    > Doctor in Production Engineering
    > FAO/UN International Consultant
    > GI-Pescado Coordinator
    > http://paginas.terra.com.br/educacao/seafoodgroup/
    > Executive member of Pan-American Network of Fish Inspection, Quality Control
    > Technology and Aquaculture
    >
    >

    --
    JV
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 28 2007 - 13:28:49 PDT