RE: Question from Peru

From: Barber, Kathleen G. (BB) (barberk@bumblebee.com)
Date: Thu Aug 31 2006 - 14:07:40 PDT

  • Next message: Robert Stone: "Russia"

    Hello Victor,
    In our experience with tuna we have encountered all scenarios - decomposed
    fish with no histamine, acceptable fish (no odors of decomposition) with
    high histamine and decomposed fish with high histamine.

    I believe it has to do with the complex interaction between spoilage
    bacteria and histamine forming bacteria. If the spoilage bacteria win the
    competition then fish will spoil before histamine can be formed; sounds like
    that is what you have found.

    In any event, decomposition or fish with bad odors mean the fish has been
    time/temperature abused and there is a possibility of histamine formation.

    Regards,
    Kathleen Barber
    Bumble Bee Foods

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Gonzaga Victor (Contractor), NMRCD Lima
    [mailto:VGonzaga@nmrcd.med.navy.mil]
    Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 1:07 PM
    To: 'seafood@ucdavis.edu'
    Subject: Question from Peru

    Hi everyone,

    I've just been registered to this listserv. Thanks to Pamela for allowing me
    to be part of this group.

    Well, briefly, I conducted a small study among scombridae fish in Lima, all
    of them from different public markets and two big sea-product markets. My
    concern was about some samples which smell really bad but histamine levels
    were under 2 PPM. Fish was tested by Veratox. Some comments? I know there
    is not relation between high veratox levels and no odor, but there is a
    relation between bad odor and high levels?

    Regards,

    Victor



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2006 - 15:55:21 PDT