RE: The Dangers in Aquaculture's Boom (Wash. Post Article)

From: Scott Zimmerman (marineaquaculture@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 01 2005 - 17:43:32 PST

  • Next message: Schalk Alain: "Histamine Field Test - Chapter 2."

    The Dangers in Aquaculture's Boom
    Tuesday, February 1, 2005; Page A16 - Washington Post

    Encouraging the aquaculture industry sets a troubling precedent in the
    United States [front page, Jan. 24]. This relatively new industry entices
    consumers with rock-bottom prices and illusions of sustainability, but the
    repercussions of this "blue revolution" are felt individually and at a
    global level.

    Aquaculture is being marketed as a new protein source, but consumers aren't
    hearing all the facts. Fish feed, such as plankton, is harvested from the
    ocean to feed farm-raised seafood, leaving wild fish populations at even
    greater risk and ultimately causing a net loss of protein. Consider shrimp,
    the No. 1 seafood choice in the United States for three years running:

    Nearly 90 percent of the shrimp we eat is farm-raised, amounting to more
    than 1.1 billion pounds each year. Up to three pounds of wild-caught fish is
    needed to raise just one pound of farm-raised shrimp.

    Not only are the oceans still being depleted, but many shrimp farms depend
    on staggering amounts of antibiotics, fungicides, algaecides and pesticides
    to fight diseases that run rampant in the polluted ponds created to harvest
    the shrimp. Research shows that over time, bacteria exposed to antibiotics
    may become more resistant to those antibiotics, and patients infected with
    such bacteria are more difficult to treat.

    We shouldn't encourage similar farms to sprout up across the United States.
    Educated consumers should avoid farm-raised shrimp and fish.

    WENONAH HAUTER

    Director, Food Program

    Public Citizen
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    TO WENONAH HAUTER-

    I am an American MSc. aquaculture student and I am not getting paid for
    promoting the aquaculture industry. I am not a huge supporter of shrimp
    monoculture, but your article was way overboard. The Washington Post, a
    credible newspaper, should be ashamed after publishing your article and your
    organization should be reprimanded for its shortsighted perspective. The
    Public Citizen, a body that protects health, safety, and democracy, has no
    right to condemn aquaculture by saying, “educated consumers should avoid
    farm-raised shrimp and fish.” The uneducated can respect your dated
    position, but the industry is currently becoming more sustainable. Years
    ago, there was an excessive use of antibiotic, hormone, chemicals and
    fishmeals, but today unnecessary overuse is a dieing trend. You were able to
    sum up the industry with the “Up to three pounds of wild-caught fish is
    needed to raise just one pound of farm-raised shrimp” slogan, but that is
    also no longer the case. This and other uninformed/dated perspectives are
    setting precedence and they must be stopped. More importantly, they are
    fear-mongering techniques that should not be promoted by an organization
    that represents the public citizen. Worldwide, there are a variety of farms
    that promote the incorporation of vegetable fats and proteins into feeds and
    have zero tolerance for antibiotic, hormone and chemicals. Like other
    livestock producers, the FDA BMP’s are strictly adhered to. If you need
    active commercial examples they are readily available upon your request.

    The aquaculture industry is being reformed and the public should be aware of
    that. Your article doesn’t mention other aquaculture based industries such
    as, bioreactors that create renewable energy resources/health supplements
    from microalgae, ornamental growers that take the pressure off the reef, the
    use of molluscs/shellfish to filter bays and agricultural run-off,
    integrated agriculture/polyculture of freshwater fish and vegetables and
    sponge farmers that supply researchers with products to cure diseases.
    Aquaculture is also becoming a vehicle for renewable energy resources such
    as geothermal, wind and solar power. The integration between renewable
    energy, agriculture, aquaculture and natural fisheries is rapidly becoming
    the commercially and environmentally acceptable alternative. The aquaculture
    industry is extremely diverse and your article in no way represents that
    diversity. Your organization is unaware of the importance of the aquaculture
    industry as a whole and your article is a shocking example of its ignorance.

    The “blue revolution” will continue to evolve, as did the “green
    revolution”, and the people that care about this planet will learn from its
    mistakes and develop rules to promote sustainable growth. Shrimp farming and
    other aquaculture industries will always be responsible for their end
    products. That doesn’t give “The Public Citizen” the right to use an
    out-dated wepon to bash the aquaculture industry as a whole. You did not
    list one benefit of aquaculture and I feel that your article is a personal
    attack on a misrepresented industry.

    Sincerely,

    Scott E. Zimmerman
    Director/Owner
    MarineAquafarms.com/SeafoodFarms.com-
    "Linking Partners for More Productive Oceans"
    http://www.marineaquafarms.com
    marineaquaculture@hotmail.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 17:45:41 PST