RE: Histamine Field Test

From: Clare Winkel (straddiegal@optusnet.com.au)
Date: Tue Feb 01 2005 - 01:02:46 PST

  • Next message: Pamela Tom: "University of Florida Shrimp School 2005"

    Histamine Field TestDear James,

    In Australia the major supermarket chain requires all seafood suppliers to
    test for histamine in "raw fish fillets/loin" to the maximum limits of
    <100mg/kg.

    This is a cost burden for small suppliers and a hassle for the suppliers in
    the more remote areas away from labs. It also pretty ineffective as they
    only test the most basic requirements and often test non histamine species
    either deliberately or through ignorance.

    A test kit would be really appreciated and please remember that most of the
    worlds currency is running at less than the USD.

    Does anyone in the group know of a charity that is working to rebuild the
    boats for the Sri LANKAN fishermen to donate to? Also if anyone is involved
    with the fishing people do they need a HACCP trainer/consultant/auditor
    volunteer ?

    Clare Winkel
    Australia
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-seafood@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-seafood@ucdavis.edu]On
    Behalf Of Hungerford, James M
      Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 4:40 AM
      To: 'seafood@ucdavis.edu'
      Subject: Histamine Field Test

      A question for those in the seafood industry, government regulators,
    inspectors, analysts, etc:

      How many of you would purchase and use a simple and rapid field test for
    histamine in fresh, frozen, or canned fish?

      I am exploring the possiblities for a commercially available field test
    kit for histamine that would use a simple cassette format (lateral flow
    cassette as used in pregnancy test kits). There would be no chemicals to
    handle, and no solutions other than the distilled-water extract of fish
    (prepared on site) since the test kit itself is "solid state." The kit would
    respond in approx 30 min. Sample requirements are low and their is potential
    for less "disfigurement" of the fish as discussed on this forum. Results
    would be qualitative (for example "above 50 PPM" or "below 50 PPM") and
    would mainly be used for screening and for quality control.

      Roughly how many tests would your firm or agency perform each year?

      What do you feel is a reasonable cost per sample?
      Please note that although I work for FDA, statements made in this message
    do not reflect FDA policy.

      Please respond with your thoughts on this.

      Thank You for your time.

      Sincerely,

      James Hungerford, Ph.D.
      Chair of AOAC Task Force and GR, Marine and Freshwater Toxins,

      Research Chemist
      FDA Seafood Products Research Center
      22201 23rd Dr SE
      Bothell, WA 98021
      USA
      Phone 425-483-4894
      FAX 425-483-4996

      James.Hungerford@fda.gov

    --
    No virus found in this outgoing message.
    Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
    Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.3 - Release Date: 1/31/05
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 01:20:59 PST