RE: Histamine concern in Ecuador.

From: Schalk Alain (alain.schalk@cotecna.ch)
Date: Fri Nov 05 2004 - 00:26:41 PST

  • Next message: Pamela Tom: "Two Seafood Processing Job Listings in So. America"

    John,

     

    I do not know about a particular way of sampling the fish for histamine
    test...and if there is a directive on the subject it has to be with FDA.

    But on a very practical point of view if FDA considers that there is not
    enough flesh or concentration on the tail to sample they would obviously
    look for another sampling point trying not to damage the body which is the
    main selling part....so there are left with the head part....

     

    But let us be realistic the very damage comes from the fact that the
    sampling is imposed at 100 %.........If only 5 % were sampled nobody would
    really care about the sampling procedure/point ! For me the solution is to
    get the sampling plan reduced by gaining quality confidence...

     

    Alain Schalk

    Cotecna Inspection Services

     

     

       _____

    From: PDIONPDA@aol.com [mailto:PDIONPDA@aol.com]
    Sent: 04 November 2004 19:21
    To: JonMcGraw@seafreeze.com
    Cc: alain.schalk@cotecna.ch; seafood@ucdavis.edu
    Subject: Re: Histamine concern in Ecuador.

     

    John,

    I would assume that taking the sample from the nape is simillar to taking
    samples from Swordfish for Mercury testing. That the nape would contain the
    highest concentration of histamines or mercury is cases of swordfish.

    In posting an answer to the original quaetion I would have to say that
    safety would be the priority over salability. Isen't that what HACCP is all
    about?

    Paul Dion
    Paul Dion Associates, Inc.
    Plymouth, MA 02360
    USA

    In a message dated 11/4/2004 12:28:09 PM Eastern Standard Time,
    JonMcGraw@seafreeze.com writes:

    Subj: RE: Histamine concern in Ecuador.
    Date: 11/4/2004 12:28:09 PM Eastern Standard Time
    From: JonMcGraw@seafreeze.com <mailto:JonMcGraw@seafreeze.com>
    To: alain.schalk@cotecna.ch <mailto:alain.schalk@cotecna.ch> ,
    seafood@ucdavis.edu <mailto:seafood@ucdavis.edu>
    Sent from the Internet

      Hello,
      
    I have yet to see an answer to the original question posed. I don't disagree
    with what Alain has said but I am curious as to the directive to test neck
    line vs tail. Requiring a seller to disfigure his fish in such a way as to
    reduce his market is a hardship. Is it necessary.? Is it being required
    universally? Does it provide a more definitive result?
      
    Regards
      
    Jon McGraw
    Seafreeze
    Seattle, Wa

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Schalk Alain [mailto:alain.schalk@cotecna.ch]
    Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 7:31 AM
    To: seafood@ucdavis.edu
    Subject: Histamine concern in Ecuador.

    To anonymous subscriber,

      

    It is clear that FDA did not have confidence in the final product as same
    probably reached the packing plant already with a low quality label....and
    the producer could not probably demonstrate any kind of pre-quality concern
    before final check at packing...so FDA was obliged to impose 100% sampling
    basis....According to my experience the sampling plan reduces when the
    confidence increases in the lot you have to inspect. And the only way to do
    that is to have the industry to start considering global safety programs
    considering critical points definition on board vessel or at farm side, at
    landing/transfer and processing points....The plant having suffered the
    penalty from FDA admits that they have lost the value of the shipment as not
    being sellable anymore....so now whom would they turn to for getting
    help/advices for future shipments ?? Who can answer this question today ??
    Only a few consultants are able to help them with the full package
    handling/temperature and HACCP monitoring ? I am afraid we have to urgently
    address the issue of providing training to the industry on the subject if we
    want seafood and fish to be on the menu for the years to come...

      

    Alain Schalk

    Cotecna Inspection SA

      

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    --------------------

      Seafood HACCP Mailing List

    A subscriber to this list asked me to post this message. If you have
    information, would you either share via the listserv for open discussion
    or with me privately (pdtom@ucdavis.edu)?

    "During my visit to Ecuadora question came up about sampling for
    histamine in tuna. The firm packs headed and gutted tuna (high quality)
    for the USfresh market - Miami Seafood market and NY Fulton Seafood
    market. They air freight everyday. After an FDA inspection they were
    told to sample each fish for histamine by removing at least 50 grams of
    flesh near the neck line fins (instead of the previous tail location).

    This type of sampling will destroy the esthetic quality of the fish and
    make it unsaleable in this particular market. How is this matter is being
    handled by other sellers of this product?

    ________________________________________________________________

    This communication contains information that is confidential and is intended
    for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) only. The unauthorized reading,
    disclosure or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you are not
    the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying or use
    of this communication or the information contained in it is strictly
    prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
    the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. The content of
    this message does not reflect the opinion of the Cotecna Group or any of its
    affiliates except to the extent that it relates to their official business.

    Cotecna Group strives to protect itself from computer viruses. However, as
    new viruses constantly appear, we do not accept responsibility for the
    effects of any virus which you may contract from us. We encourage our
    correspondents to implement anti-virus software, and to keep it up to date.

    Please visit our website

     

     

    ________________________________________________________________
    This communication contains information that is confidential and is intended
    for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) only. The unauthorized reading,
    disclosure or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you are not
    the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying or use
    of this communication or the information contained in it is strictly
    prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
    the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. The content of
    this message does not reflect the opinion of the Cotecna Group or any of its
    affiliates except to the extent that it relates to their official business.

                    Cotecna Group strives to protect itself from computer
    viruses. However, as new viruses constantly appear, we do not accept
    responsibility for the effects of any virus which you may contract from us.
    We encourage our correspondents to implement anti-virus software, and to
    keep it up to date.

                    Please visit our website <http://www.cotecna.com>



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 05 2004 - 00:29:13 PST