Re: Oragnoleptical testing in shrimps

From: howgate (phowgate@clara.co.uk)
Date: Fri May 21 2004 - 13:19:39 PDT

  • Next message: Stephen Thompson: "RE: Oragnoleptical testing in shrimps"

    Dear Francisco, and others

    You ask if assessing by taste 20 samples of shrimp in a day is likely to
    result in a loss of 'sensitivity'. In my experience of sensory evaluation of
    fishery products, quite considerable, I would answer no, but with one or two
    reservations. I recall visiting a fish factory and speaking to the leader of
    the quality control team who told me that the quality controllers might
    taste up to 100 samples in a 7-hour shift. The company relied very heavily
    on sensory evaluation of raw and cooked samples for quality assurance for a
    demanding customer. In my laboratory, where I ran all of the sensory panels,
    it was customary to evaluate by taste up to 12 samples in a session and up
    to 3 sessions a day at busy times. We maintained statistical monitoring of
    performance and there was no suggestion that performance was affected by
    work load. Evaluation of 20 cooked samples for flavour/taste in a day is not
    many for an experienced assessor.

    The reservations relate to what is being evaluated and for what, and the
    experience and motivation of the assessor. There are a few compounds in fish
    which might affect odour receptors such as to reduce sensitivity. By this I
    mean exposure to the compound will result in the lowered perception of the
    intensity of the odour in subsequent evaluations of similar products -
    adaptation in the sensory jargon. One such compound, for example, is
    cis-4-heptenal which is the characteristic odour of cold-stored non-fatty
    fish. There is one report, (Bett, K.L. & Johnsen, P.B., 1996. Challenges of
    evaluating sensory attributes in the presence of off-flavours ( geosmin and
    2-methylisoborneol ). Journal of Sensory Studies, 11, 1-17), that
    methylisoborneol (MIB), one of the compounds responsible for earthy/musty
    flavours in freshwater fish and crustacea induces adaptation in assessors,
    but I conducted a comprehensive review of sensory properties of these
    compounds about a year ago and this was the only reference to adaptation by
    these chemicals I came across. I haven't conducted any systematic evaluation
    of MIB to confirm this myself. If it is suspected that a chemical causes
    adaptation, (and it is not easy to demonstrate the effect), then I would
    recommend a slow pace of evaluation and the use of a palate cleanser such as
    a plain unsweetened biscuit, (cracker), between samples. (I don't consider
    palate cleansers are required for routine evaluation of fishery products
    other than rancid products). Some flavours, for example rancid flavours of
    fatty fish, can persist in the mouth and might confuse assessment of a
    subsequent sample, but this is not the same as adaptation.

    Another reservation concerns the experience and motivation of the assessor.
    Very few people can not be trained to be good assessors for evaluating
    sensory properties of fishery products. Over very many years of training and
    selection of would-be assessors I have rarely had to reject a candidate
    because he or she could not do the job. Usually the reason for rejecting a
    candidate was because the person was unwilling to do the job. It is very
    easy to get yourself off a sensory panel - just give erratic assessments. If
    an assessor seems to be becoming less precise, or less accurate - these are
    not the same thing - during the day I would first suspect boredom rather
    than loss of sensitivity. If a person's job requires that the person
    evaluates sensory properties of the products, then that can be a powerful
    motivating factor.

    Peter Howgate

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Francisco Camino" <frankcamino@yahoo.com>
    To: <seafood@ucdavis.edu>
    Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 7:49 PM
    Subject: Oragnoleptical testing in shrimps

    Dear Colleagues:

    Some sensorial specialists can tell me if a technician
    that make sensorial testing in shrimps, can loss
    sensibility for correct sensorial testings,
    considering that he or she does about 20 testings per
    day. Please consider also that he or she tastes
    samples of different origin (samples from low salinity
    and presence of cianophytas, samples with mud taste,
    samples with characterict taste, samples from high
    salinity, etc.).

    Please I would receive your comments.

    Best regards,
    Francisco Camino
    Expack Seafood, Inc.
    Brazil

    _________________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
    Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 21 2004 - 13:21:15 PDT