shrimp peeling process

From: Anne (anne@BORNSTEIN.COM)
Date: Thu Feb 13 2003 - 13:43:58 PST

  • Next message: Lupin, Hector (FIIU): "RE: Student needing help!!!"

    We are a shrimp processor in Oregon . In 1999 ,NFPA did a study for
    Dungeness Crab processing. An IT
    of 165f would provide lethality and could be used
     as an alternative to the time and temperature criteria.Some processors
    asked if this same IT could be used to determine a lethal cook for
    shrimp.We were given the
    okay by the dept. of Ag and made that part of our HACCP plan . I am hearing
    now that the FDA will not
    accept this for shrimp.Does anyone know for sure if this will not be
    acceptable? I believe that Ken Hildebrand and did a study also and agreed
    with our State agency. My second question.We have a peeler
    operator who moves from one machine to the others (4) and hourly logs the
    belt speed and the steam pressure gauge.FDA says that the peelers must be
    continuously
    monitored,which is what we are doing ,but they want
    them hooked up chart recorders. Are there any other processors who are
    doing something else? The word
    "continuous" seems to have different interpretations.I'd
    like any input..
    Thanks
    Anne Espedal
    Bornstein Seafoods
    Astoria,Or



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 13 2003 - 13:35:37 PST