Frozen fish vs its Quality

From: Jose P. Peralta (jperalta@gaechuk.gsnu.ac.kr)
Date: Thu Jan 09 2003 - 18:49:56 PST

  • Next message: Strang, Mike: "Sample size"

    Dear list:
    This posting somehow deviates from the original subject string, thus, re-titled
    differently.
    The original subject string was, " Ice content in frozen fish."

    >>What is more damaging to quality is
    that the fish has apparently been stored at -20ºC before processing and will
    be stored at -18ºC afterwards. These temperatures are too high for
    maintenance of good quality in frozen fish; a better temperature for storage
    would be around -30ºC.

    I would agree that storing at -30 C is better. Furthermore, the freezing
    process is as important as the storage temp. The thermal arrest period should
    be kept to 2 hours max.

    I recall, in one of FAOs reference, it advices frozen fish storage around -30 C,
    also.

    The international frozen fish industry have been slow in adopting such
    advisory. Nowadays, more efficient refrigeration systems are available.
    Industry practice still use -18 C storage temp.(also practiced in the
    Philippines).

    Frozen black tiger prawn, in blocks, shipped from the Phil to Japan at -18 C.

    There is however, an interesting note on frozen fish vs its quality. Raw fish
    tuna market in Japan, has been dictating low temp practices of yellowfin tuna to
    be either chilled or frozen at -65 C.

    I have info gap on the storage of the frozen tuna, thereafter, but I believe it
    is lower than -18 C. Also, please take note, that the tuna will be eaten raw,
    eventually.

    There is one thing I am certain, though, the consumers in Japan demand to have
    the highest fish quality, and they are willing to pay the price for this
    premium.

    Jose P. Peralta



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 09 2003 - 18:57:02 PST