RE: Another myth destroyed

From: George Pigott (gmp_98033@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 13:37:28 PDT

  • Next message: P Howgate: "Re: Another myth destroyed"

    Dear Jim,

    Amen Brother! Compared to everything else we eat the submitted
    data means nothing. Furthermore, we have run a wide variety of
    farmed vs. wild and find a huge variation that dwarfs what was
    presented. Even the poorest lipid spectrum in any salmon has a
    far healthier nutritional value than all other meats we consume.

    Thanks for your contribution.

    George

    --- Jim Yonker <Jim.Yonker@OceanBeauty.com> wrote:
    > I have noted with interest your comments. What's actually
    > being said is salmon, both wild and farmed, contain a high
    > level of Omega-3's, that depending on consumption patterns,
    > are very healthy to eat. Rather than waste time on pointing
    > fingers at which type of salmon may have a higher level of
    > Omega 3's, it's to our benefit to say that salmon, because of
    > its' high levels of Omega 3's, is a more healthy product to
    > eat, than beef! Also, since there is no evidence of E.coli
    > 157.H, it is a safer food product than meat. Because of these
    > two factors, USDA should give a higher consideration to
    > using salmon, epecially the 100% Natural Wild Alaska salmon,
    > in this country's School Lunch Programs.
    > Jim Yonker
    > Director, Food Safety & Quality Assurance
    > and Regulatory Programs
    > Ocean Beauty Seafoods, Inc.
    > PO Box 70739 - 1100 W. Ewing St.
    > Seattle, WA 98109
    > ph: (206)-285-6800 fax: (206)-281-5897
    > Email: jim.yonker@oceanbeauty.com
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Santerre, Charles
    > To: seafood@ucdavis.edu
    > Sent: 5/24/02 4:55 PM
    > Subject: Another myth destroyed
    >
    > Dear List: We have had a chance to calculate the amount of
    > omega-3 fatty
    > acid in farmed vs. wild fish using the USDA online database.
    > The
    > findings are attached. It appears that for Coho and Atlantic
    > salmon and
    > Rainbow trout the amount of omega-3 fatty acid is higher in
    > farmed fish.
    > In the case of Channel catfish the omega-3 fatty acid is
    > lower. It is
    > well known, however, that farmed catfish is not an excellent
    > source of
    > omega-3 fatty acids. Hopefully, the industry will take note
    > and adjust
    > the feed composition to increase the levels of omega-3 fatty
    > acids in
    > the edible tissue.
    >
    > This dispells another error started by the folks at the David
    > Suzuki
    > Foundation. I would agree with them that the amount of lipid
    > in a
    > farmed-fish is generally higher than in a wild fish (still
    > lower than
    > many meat products) and that the ratio of omega-3 fatty acid
    > to total
    > lipid is lower. But generally, the content of omega-3 fatty
    > acid in a
    > serving of salmon or trout will be greater in a farmed fish
    > than in a
    > wild fish.
    >
    > I hope this clarifies the issue. Charlie
    >
    >
    > <<FattyAcidsFarm.pdf>>
    >
    > Charles R. Santerre, Ph.D.
    > Associate Professor
    > Department of Foods and Nutrition
    > Purdue University
    > 1264 Stone Hall
    > West Lafayette, IN 47907-1264
    > telephone 765/496-3443
    > facsimile 765/494-0674
    > e-mail santerre@purdue.edu
    >
    >
    >
    > Charles R. Santerre, Ph.D.
    > Associate Professor
    > Department of Foods and Nutrition
    > Purdue University
    > 1264 Stone Hall
    > West Lafayette, IN 47907-1264
    > telephone 765/496-3443
    > facsimile 765/494-0674
    > e-mail santerre@purdue.edu
    >
    > <<FattyAcidsFarm.pdf>>
    >

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
    http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 27 2002 - 13:43:34 PDT