Re: VACUUM-PACKED FISH

From: S85026680 (S85026680@student.usp.ac.fj)
Date: Thu May 09 2002 - 13:46:29 PDT

  • Next message: Naturecentre: "(no subject)"

    Hello

    Strictly speaking it is difficult for you to use temperature as a CL when
    the product is produced by a supplier and supplied to you vacuum-packed.
    In other words, that product has been proved to be safe for human
    consumption based on your suppliers HACCP plan.

    In my oppinion, you should push the control upstream and use "Supplier
    Guarantee form" as your Cl. Every batch you recieve must be accompanied
    by a SGF. Any consignment that do not have a SGF accompanied with shoule
    be put on-hold until a SGF is recieved from your supplier.

    Regards

    Gabriel Victor Titili
    Tuna Processing Specialist
    Tripacific Marine Limited
    Suva
    Fiji
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jose Roques <Jose.Roques@bellcold.com>
    To: "'seafood@ucdavis.edu'" <seafood@ucdavis.edu>
    Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 11:17:49 -0700
    Subject: VACUUM-PACKED FISH

    > Dear List:
    >
    > I have just gone through our HACCP review for 2002 and a question was
    > brought up. We receive fresh salmon that has been vacuum-packed. In our
    > HACCP we established that reception of vacuum-packed fish is a CCP and
    > the
    > critical limit was set at 38F. The problem is that we do not own this
    > product and, therefore, we cannot puncture the package to get a core
    > temperature. We have resolved this by inserting a wire-probe between 2
    > packages. Unfortunately, our production representative indicates that
    > by
    > following this procedure the temperatures are always above 38F (in the
    > high
    > 40s).
    >
    > Does anybody have any ideas to deal with this type of product?
    >
    > Thank you for your help.
    >
    > José M. Roqués
    > Bellingham Cold Storage
    > Special Projects Manager/QA Manager
    > Phone: (360)733-1640
    > Fax: (360)671-2587
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 09 2002 - 17:13:02 PDT