RE: supposed lack of mngmnt plan for chile bass

From: Dennis Thomas (djt@sealord.co.nz)
Date: Sun Feb 10 2002 - 16:40:39 PST

  • Next message: Balamurugan: "chlorampnicol in seafod"

    Attached comments from our marine biologist, who has met Beth Clark.
     
    "Facts are: A number of toothfish fisheries have been significantly
    overfished, primarily within the EEZ's of countries that have been unable or
    unwilling to provide naval vessels to protect their resources. These have
    been fished to levels that are now uneconomic to fish, but are not at
    extinct levels.
     
    The USA now has border controls and a catch documentation scheme in place to
    ensure that any toothfish consumed in US restaurants comes from legal and
    sustainable fisheries. Ban it in the restaurant, and the person that will
    probably suffer the most is a Chilean peasant who goes out in a dory each
    day and handlines down to 1500 m to catch a couple of toothfish, brings it
    ashore so that it can be airfreighted to the US, and he can then feed his
    family. These guys catch quite a few thousand tonnes per year, because
    there are a lot of them.
     
    For every one tonne- 5-6 are illegal is totally wrong, and the CCAMLR group
    that reviewed IUU fishing last November (Beth is a member) concluded that
    more was legal caught than illegal.
     
    And Orange Roughy is not extinct, and they should read the latest reports
    about the biggest, longest running fishery in the world- the Chatham Rise,
    where the catch limit was increased last year because the stock is above
    MSY."
     
     
    Dennis Thomas
    Sealord Group, NZ

    -----Original Message-----
    From: BARRY COHAN [mailto:COHAN@earthlink.net]
    Sent: Friday, 8 February 2002 11:23
    To: seafood@ucdavis.edu
    Subject: charlatans masquerading as ecologists

    Help. The other night a meeting was held in San Francisco that was attended
    by many of the most influential and successful restaurateurs in the area.
    They were told by a group including 1) Beth Clark, "a biologist and director
    of the Antarctica Project" , and Robert Mazurek, "a fisheries research
    biologist for the Monterey Bay Aquarium's seafood watch program", among
    perhaps others (I was not there: this is all pieced together from newspaper
    articles as well as radio news pieces). What they were told was, 1) At the
    current level of fishing, Chilean Seabass will be extinct (in some accounts,
    just "commercially" extinct) in 5 years 2)"of the most popular seafood
    dishes, Chilean sea bass is in the worst shape. Worse than orange roughy,
    worse than sharks,worse than rockfish and Atlantic swordfish. 3)"For every
    ton of legally caught fish, 5 or 6 tons are taken illegally"....I heard a
    lot more, but I developed a case of vertigo that I haven't been able to
    shake since.
         Please, ucdavis-ites, .edu me. And soon, please....
                        Barry Cohan

    The information contained in this E-mail is CONFIDENTIAL and
    may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the recipient
    named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
    any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is
    strictly prohibited. If you have received this message and attachments in
    error, please notify the sender and destroy the original message.
    You are also notified that the views expressed in this E-mail do not
    necessarily reflect those of the company.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 10 2002 - 16:50:48 PST