Summary of the World Fish Inspection & Quality Control Congress

From: Pamela Tom (pdtom@ucdavis.edu)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 12:16:51 PST

  • Next message: Graeme Summers: ""Cosmos" Instrument"

    To: Seafood HACCP Mailing List
    Fr: Pamela Tom, List Co-Owner

    The 4th World Fish Inspection & Quality Control Congress was held on
    October 24-26 in Vancouver, Canada. Over 260 representatives from
    government, industry and academia attended from major fish producing and
    importing countries. "Science and Technology on Fish Inspection and
    Quality Control" was the conference theme and focused on methods for
    improving inspection techniques, more effective HACCP verification
    techniques, risk assessment methods and how to advance recognition of
    national inspection systems.

    Below is a brief summary by Joe Slavin of selected papers and
    presentations...

    -Valdimarsson, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    (FAO), noted that FAO has developed a system termed Fish Safety. Using
    the EcoPort technology and multi-species information, FAO will be in a
    position to provide information to assist in harmonizing HACCP based
    inspection systems.

    -Spiller, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), stressed the need to
    look to risk assessment techniques "in ways that steward and promote new
    technologies." He pointed out that while the 1990's focused on HACCP, risk
    assessment is the next big thing in the new millennium.

    -Bundy, Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), discussed regulatory
    verification of HACCP systems and reported that Canada has developed a
    framework and flexible tools to assess the capability of the processor to
    operate in accordance with the documented system and regulatory
    requirements.

    -Hansen, U.S. FDA, reported on research on developing a model to determine
    the optimal inspection frequency for seafood HACCP. A sub-sample of 402
    inspections were evaluated and the firms were categorized as low, medium
    or high risk and as manufacturers, repackers or warehouses. The results
    showed that medium and high risk plants should be inspected every six
    months, and low risk plants could be reduced to inspection once every two
    years since these plants are largely compliant. Hansen pointed out that
    these results are tentative and more in-depth study will be required.

    -Suwanrangsi, Department of Fisheries, Thailand, reported on
    implementation of the "UN Resolution on Code of Conduct for Responsible
    Fisheries," which includes good aquaculture practices, good practices for
    feed/drug and chemical suppliers, and good practices for harvesting,
    marketing, processing and labeling of shrimp.

    -Mukhina, St. Petersburg, Russia, discussed procedures used to control
    Listeria in Russia. HACCP has been implemented in Russia since 1996 and
    the National Center for Quality and Safety of Fishery Products is
    monitoring HACCP systems in 300 processing factories. In some areas there
    is at least a 50% Listeria contamination of fish in its habitat, and
    contaminated fish is a cause for secondary contamination during the
    processing and handling.

    -Gelman and others from Israel reported on application of the "Cosmos"
    instrument made in Japan which showed a high correlation between
    organoleptic and data obtained from the instrument in evaluating the
    quality of fresh fish.

    -La Fortune, Canada, reviewed issues that can have a significant impact on
    fish and fishery products as a result of discussions at the WTO Trade
    Ministers meeting in November 2001. He urged industry to keep abreast of
    these developments.

    -Sumner and Gallagher of Australia discussed seafood consumption risks and
    their management. A risk rating of low, medium or high can be made based
    on the known illness when evaluated relative to the number of people and
    meals. A high risk ranking is associated with hazard product pairings
    which consistently cause large-scale problems, such as viruses in oysters
    and ciguatera in warm waters. A medium risk ranking is associated with
    outbreaks which are rare and involve lower numbers of consumers. A low
    risk ranking is associated with hazard product pairings which almost never
    cause illness.

    A report of the Conference will be published by the International
    Association of Fish Inspectors (IAFI), web: http://www.iafi.net

    Source: U.S. Seafood News, Vol . 9 Issue 11, November 2001
    Joseph W. Slavin & Associates
    E-mail: jws2827@aol.com Web: www.seafoodglobalservices.com
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    This is the Seafood HACCP Discussion Group. Information is
    available on the web at:
    http://seafood.ucdavis.edu/listserv/Listserv.htm
    For inquiries on subscribing to the list, e-mail: pdtom@ucdavis.edu

    To subscribe, e-mail listproc@ucdavis.edu with the message:
    subscribe seafood [your first name] [your last name]
    To unsubscribe, e-mmail listproc@ucdavis.edu with the message:
    unsubscribe seafood

    Files from the seafood HACCP listserv are now archived at:
    http://listproc.ucdavis.edu/archives/seafood/
    --------------------------------------------------------------



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 06 2001 - 12:18:36 PST