RE: The HACCP situation in US

From: Liz Best (liz@akgen.com)
Date: Tue Dec 05 2000 - 08:56:30 PST

  • Next message: Jon Pall Hreinsson: "RE: The HACCP situation in US"

    I do not know what your exact complaints regarding these US manufactures is,
    but HACCP does not immediately quantify into a need to purchase additional
    equipment nor modernize a processing facility. HACCP is a program designed
    to assure product safety. Yes, I agree that newer technology is a good
    addition to any processing facility, but new equipment is worthless if one
    does not understand the basic premise of food safety. If one has good
    maintenance programs in place, assures that the plant is cleaned properly
    and educates its work force it does not matter the age of the facilty or the
    equipment. Remember HACCP is a food safety program designed to "highlight"
    those areas within a process determined as needing a higher level of control
    in order to maintain the safety of the food being produced. I hope I have
    clarified this for you.
    >From the desk of Elizabeth Best
    email liz@akgen.com

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jon Pall Hreinsson [mailto:jonpall@3x.is]
    Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 12:12 AM
    To: seafood@ucdavis.edu
    Subject: The HACCP situation in US

     hi,<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
    "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

    As manufacturer of equipment in various seafood processing industries, I
    have seen many plants over the world. What has been interested for me is to
    see how plants exporting to the US and EU have modernized and improved their
    processing facilities and equipment to undertake the HACCP regulations.
    However it has equally interesting to see how many processing plants in the
    US have failed to do the same. I have seen frequently plants in the US that
    are more the 10 years behind plants in northern Europe and far away from
    being able to comply with the HACCP regulation. This made me think if the
    HACCP was, or was initially set up a technical import restriction to the US.
    I can't think of any other reason why the US are so strict on enforcing the
    HACCP rule for imported fish, while at the same time US produced seafood, at
    least in some cases, have failed to enforced the same regulations.

    I hope I am not offending anybody. I am sure that many seafood processors in
    US have a good plant that have the HACCP regulation in order. My colleagues
    and I have however personally visited number of plants that are not even
    close of getting HACCP.

    You must not for get that with HACCP you get a better and more secure
    product, but it comes at a price (more cost of capital and higher operating
    costs). Thus, the tendency will always be that some will slack in producer's
    effort to enforce such a regulation.

    re,
     
    jonpall
     

    3X-Stal http://www.3x.is/ <http://www.3x.is/>
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    Jon Pall Hreinsson Tel. +354 456 5079
    Marketing Manager Fax. +354 456 5479
    --------------------------------------------------------------
        Processing Solutions Made Easy!

     



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 05 2000 - 08:46:50 PST