The HACCP situation in US

From: Jon Pall Hreinsson (jonpall@3x.is)
Date: Tue Dec 05 2000 - 00:12:21 PST

  • Next message: J. (Jan) A.M. Verhoeven: "Re: Use of lactates in smoked products"

     hi,
    As manufacturer of equipment in various seafood processing industries, I
    have seen many plants over the world. What has been interested for me is to
    see how plants exporting to the US and EU have modernized and improved their
    processing facilities and equipment to undertake the HACCP regulations.
    However it has equally interesting to see how many processing plants in the
    US have failed to do the same. I have seen frequently plants in the US that
    are more the 10 years behind plants in northern Europe and far away from
    being able to comply with the HACCP regulation. This made me think if the
    HACCP was, or was initially set up a technical import restriction to the US.
    I can’t think of any other reason why the US are so strict on enforcing the
    HACCP rule for imported fish, while at the same time US produced seafood, at
    least in some cases, have failed to enforced the same regulations.

    I hope I am not offending anybody. I am sure that many seafood processors in
    US have a good plant that have the HACCP regulation in order. My colleagues
    and I have however personally visited number of plants that are not even
    close of getting HACCP.

    You must not for get that with HACCP you get a better and more secure
    product, but it comes at a price (more cost of capital and higher operating
    costs). Thus, the tendency will always be that some will slack in producer’s
    effort to enforce such a regulation.

    re,

    jonpall

    3X-Stal http://www.3x.is/
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    Jon Pall Hreinsson Tel. +354 456 5079
    Marketing Manager Fax. +354 456 5479
    --------------------------------------------------------------
        Processing Solutions Made Easy!



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 05 2000 - 00:12:11 PST