RE: Good Morning America 11/2 fresh seafood report

From: Ken Hilderbrand (ken.hilderbrand@hmsc.orst.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 03 2000 - 16:00:30 PST

  • Next message: Dr. Jose P. Peralta: "Re: Good Morning America 11/2 fresh seafood report"

    Fish of course are cold blooded and have a natural micro flora of cold
    loving organisms. So they do spoil faster than warm blooded animals. When is
    the last time you heard of fish being aged 3 weeks prior to sale.

    And by the way, the last time I checked, Portland Oregon is not an ocean
    front city.

                   "However, another oceanfront city — Portland, Ore. —
                     had no fish with bacteria over the limit."

    Kenneth S. Hilderbrand Jr.
    Seafood Processing Specialist
    Sea Grant Extension Program
    Oregon State Univ. Marine Science Center
    2030 Sth Marine Science Drive
    Newport, Oregon 97365-5296 USA
    phone: 541 867-0242
    fax: 541 867-0138
    email: <ken.hilderbrand@hmsc.orst.edu>

      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-seafood@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-seafood@ucdavis.edu]On
    Behalf Of David J. Solomon
      Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 12:45 PM
      To: Douglas L. Marshall
      Cc: seafood@ucdavis.edu
      Subject: Re: Good Morning America 11/2 fresh seafood report

      I wonder how the actual results would relate to a similar test of poultry,
    or red meat.
      Unfortunately, my own experiences looking and smelling fresh fish across
    the country, would lead me to expect that the fish would fare the worst.

                          David J. Solomon
                     dsolomon@attglobal.net
      phone: (954) 349-1236 fax: (954) 349-3742
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Douglas L. Marshall
        To: David J. Solomon
        Cc: seafood@ucdavis.edu
        Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 15:15
        Subject: Re: Good Morning America 11/2 fresh seafood report

        Direct quote from the GMA article: "In fact, most of the fish did pass
    the
        test."

        As in most sensationalistic media reports, only the provacative makes
    news.
        Interesting that the article failed to give the percentage of product
    that
        passed the arbitrary cutoff! My guess is that the results showed that
    the
        industry does a pretty good job overall. They just pointed out the few
    obvious
        failures. Too bad the negative carries more weight than the positive.

        Doug Marshall
        Mississippi State University

        Quoting "David J. Solomon" <dsolomon@attglobal.net>:

    > Can't we as an industry do better than this?
    >
    >
    >
    http://more.abcnews.go.com/onair/goodmorningamerica/gma001002fish_feature.ht
    ml
    > David J. Solomon
    > dsolomon@attglobal.net
    > phone: (954) 349-1236 fax: (954) 349-3742
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 03 2000 - 16:02:44 PST