I wonder how the actual results would relate to a similar test of poultry, or red meat.
Unfortunately, my own experiences looking and smelling fresh fish across the country, would lead me to expect that the fish would fare the worst.
David J. Solomon
dsolomon@attglobal.net
phone: (954) 349-1236 fax: (954) 349-3742
----- Original Message -----
From: Douglas L. Marshall
To: David J. Solomon
Cc: seafood@ucdavis.edu
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 15:15
Subject: Re: Good Morning America 11/2 fresh seafood report
Direct quote from the GMA article: "In fact, most of the fish did pass the
test."
As in most sensationalistic media reports, only the provacative makes news.
Interesting that the article failed to give the percentage of product that
passed the arbitrary cutoff! My guess is that the results showed that the
industry does a pretty good job overall. They just pointed out the few obvious
failures. Too bad the negative carries more weight than the positive.
Doug Marshall
Mississippi State University
Quoting "David J. Solomon" <dsolomon@attglobal.net>:
> Can't we as an industry do better than this?
>
>
> http://more.abcnews.go.com/onair/goodmorningamerica/gma001002fish_feature.html
> David J. Solomon
> dsolomon@attglobal.net
> phone: (954) 349-1236 fax: (954) 349-3742
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 03 2000 - 12:48:47 PST