Reality and YPS

From: Tom McLean (mcleant@spi-seafoods.com)
Date: Mon Jun 12 2000 - 11:29:43 PDT

  • Next message: Howgate: "Re: COMPLEX SALT COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING FREE CYANIDE FROM YPS"

    To Listers:

    I have found the discussion on the YPS issue to interesting and even
    entertaining. I for one would not want to shut the door on such issues
    however I find it distressing to read such quick dismissal of some very
    detailed and well thought out attempts to put the issue into perspective
    as far as the true risk of injury. Especially since those supplying the
    information are the experts and have the credentials to back it up.

    This whole issue is really only about the degree of risk since
    everything we do, say and eat from the first decision to wake up in the
    morning till the next awakening carries some level of risk. When it
    comes to smoked fish there are several items that carry far more risk
    and warrant more attention than YPS. Just looking at the "chemical"
    aspect; applying partially burnt wood products from many varied woods
    and using many more methods, applies known carcinogens and toxins in
    much higher levels. Somebody worried about YPS should probably not be
    in the smoking business. Based on consumption calculations that I have
    read here, to consume enough YPS, via smoked fish, to raise concern
    would probably kill the subject from NaCl overload not to mention fish
    overload While seeking to denigrate YPS as evil may I suggest whomever
    has the deep pockets also see if this cyanide laced product is
    inhibiting microbial outgrowth or toxin formation.

    I have also repeatedly wondered why somebody in Chile is so concerned
    about what FDA and USDA is going to do about the issue or why they have
    not responded. To comment would add credence to what is, at this point
    unproven and alarmist, much like yelling "fire" in a crowded theater.
    Advising clients to make a change on unproven speculation is
    questionable advise. Since Mr. Dewitty has been well funded for this
    info may I suggest that he commission an independent non biased study on
    this subject and when there is proof then you can expect FDA and others
    to comment or react (myself included). Does not Chile have a regulatory
    agency? I for one would start my safety inquiry in my own country.

    I am also concerned by what I interpret as a veiled threat to the
    industry if others do not follow suit and eliminate the use of salt that
    contains YPS. The Chilean fish farming industry needs to be more
    concerned about the feeds, dyes and drugs used in that segment of the
    industry than obscure and unproved risks of YPS.

    Please Mr. Dewitty, this is your issue, you have the funds, do your
    homework first and then come back with the facts and proof. You are
    attmpting to badger others into funding and doing the work to prove or
    disprove your concerns.

    Tom McLean
    A look at the big picture, don't miss the forest because of the trees
    and do not throw out the baby with the bath water consultant.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 12 2000 - 12:36:25 PDT