YSP in Salt

From: John C Wekell (John.C.Wekell@noaa.gov)
Date: Tue Mar 28 2000 - 08:04:50 PST

  • Next message: Ppprotein@aol.com: "Re: YPS SMOKED FISH"

    Before this discussion goes too far, it would be wise to place this
    particular food additive into a rational perspective. I would direct
    readers, who have an interest in this, to a chapter on naturally occurring
    cyanide sources, see Chapter 6 “Glycosides” (pages 173-234) in Natural
    Toxicants in Feeds and Poisonous Plants edited by Peter R. Cheeke and Lee R.
    Shull, published by AVI Publishing Co., Westport, CN (1985). While the book
    is 15 years old, cyanide analysis hasn't changed that much in the
    intervening period.

    The reported lethal dose for cyanide is in the range of 0.5 mg to 3 mg/Kg
    (see the above chapter pg 179). Assuming the customary 70 Kg human being,
    this places the lethal quantity of cyanide in the range of 35 mg to 210mg.
    In the area of toxic compounds, at least those occurring in nature, this isn
    ’t really very toxic. There are far worse poisons out there folks! Compare
    this with PSP toxins, where the estimated lethal dose is about 2 mg;
    palytoxin (another marine biotoxin) is somewhere in the microgram range,
    Botulism toxin is probably in the picogram range. Now we're talking real
    toxins!

    But let’s get back to our cyanide. Let’s take the lethal dose range and
    assume a dose somewhere near the lowest level, e.g., 70 mg or a dose of 1
    mg/Kg. Assuming 13 ppm permitted YPS expressed as the anhydrous salt, i.e.,
    without the water of hydration (that’s 10 moles of water per mole of YPS),
    about 50% of the molecular weight of anhydrous YPS is cyanide. This means
    that about 6.5 ppm of the 13ppm total permitted is cyanide. Let us assume
    the absolutely worse case scenario and that all of the YSP is somehow
    converted instantaneously into hydrogen cyanide (HCN), keeping in mind that
    the blast would probably kill you. This would require about 11 Kg of salt
    (that's about 24 pounds of salt)! Now I know that we Americans consume salt
    in prodigious quantities but I don’t think we come even close to consuming
    that much AT ONE SITTING! I doubt that the average person even has 24
    pounds of salt in their home at one time. And if we did, I doubt it would
    be out laying around in the sunshine (living here in the Seattle area, this
    would be nearly impossible). Since we consume about 2 grams (that’s being
    good) to 10 grams (that’s being really naughty) of salt per day our intake
    of cyanide would be about 13 to 65 MICROGRAMS.

    But what does this mean in terms of risk? Let’s go back to the Glycosides
    chapter in order to compare the amount of YSP to what is found in other
    typical foodstuffs. Again, check out page 179 in that chapter. For example,
    Lima Beans contain 10-300 milligrams CN/100g plant tissue. Assuming you eat
    about 1 oz or about 30 grams of Lima Beans, you would potentially be getting
    a dose of 3 to 100 milligrams of CN—keep in mind that these are MILLIGRAMS
    not MICROGRAMS. The relative risk of CN poisoning would be about a 1000
    times greater than exposure to salt. Unfortunately, I really like those lima
    beans!

    Frankly, I am not worried about the small amount of YSP that may or may not
    be present in my table salt. Nevertheless, if there were another
    anti-caking agent (the aluminum silicates, for example) that had a lower
    risk than it should be selected—that’s just good risk management, good
    marketing, and "common sense". What I am objecting to in this whole
    discussion, is suggesting “courses of action” that are based in fear,
    exaggerated or just plain based on ignorance. If we, collectively, want to
    get rid of YSP—fine, but let’s base it on sound toxicology and a clear
    understanding of all the risks.

    One last point, Marion Dewitt raises the point that YSP is used in salt used
    for road de-icing. He states that the levels permitted there are 100 ppm
    YSP. Frankly, I have some issues with using salt on roads because of the
    damage to my car and its impact on the environment, but then I happen to
    live in an area where we don’t get much snow and ice. I won’t go through
    the same calculations because this is an issue for another listserver, not a
    seafood one. But my guess is that if we did math, we would find that there
    are other far greater risks presented if we didn’t use the salt (for
    example, crashes due to the slippery conditions). I leave that to others.

    Jack Wekell



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 28 2000 - 08:05:25 PST