The problem is, public libraries were never intended as federal offices but
local services to the public.
The underlying question is ; how does identification of each patron ensure
security? - Is an unnamed individual more of a security risk?
Ie. once a person enters the building w/ proper ID, there is nothing to
prevent that individual from secreting something dangerous & leaving w/o
being detected.
Is a picture ID required? Since the drivers license is the most common ID,
nondrivers may be excuded unless they have acquired a seldom used
"non-drivers" license or passport
Most indigent have neither.
Another aspect is the privacy issue - once identification upon entry is
recorded, there can be legitimate concern over the patron's right to
read/view materials w/ privacy.
Karen Mahnk
At 10:39 AM 11/2/1999 -0500, folensbb@pepperlaw.com wrote:
>While federal buildings in DC are public buildings and open to the public,
they require ID before you can enter and use the facilities. The security
aspect outweighs the problem with denying access to information. They
don't deny anyone access as long as you have ID. My impression is that the
policies are long standing but I haven't had need to access such facilities
until recently, so maybe somone else in DC remembers when the tighter
security went into effect and if there was any attempt to contest it.
>
>Barbara Folensbee
>
>Barbara Folensbee-Moore
>Librarian
>Pepper Hamilton LLP
>Washington, D.C.
>202-220-1528
>folensbb@pepperlaw.com
>
>>>> "karenpdo@gate.net" 11/02 9:30 AM >>>
> Interesting - this can have serious implications if it catches on - but
>isn't a "national identification" /(your "papers" when in public)
>unconstitutional? - I would think/hope that this dies @ first challenge.
>Karen Mahnk
>
>At 03:42 PM 11/1/1999 -0600, Carol Billings wrote:
>>Our public/state law library is in the Supreme Court building--opening off
>>of the main lobby right inside the building's front doors. The court has
>>placed security guards on duty, and everyone entering the building has
>>been required for the past few years to run their possessions through
>>an airport-style x-ray machine and to walk through a metal detector. The
>>court has just today instituted a new policy that requires everyone
>>entering to show identification, sign in, wear a "visitor" tag while in the
>>building and then sign out before departing. I just inquired of one of the
>>guards what happens if someone wishes to use the library but does not
>>happen to have identification with him or her. I was told that the person
>>may not enter. Maybe I'm crazy, but I'm outraged! I have made the
>>statement that I have never had to present identification to be admitted to
>>any type of library. I would very much appreciate knowing whether any
>>other public libraries have security restrictions that have the effect of
>>limiting access. I would also like to know if any colleagues have access
>>policies or know of instances where the right of access to public
>>libraries or other public buildings has been tested legally. I'll very
much
>>appreciate hearing from you. Carol Billings, Law Library of Louisiana
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
*****************************************************
>This electronic mail transmission contains confidential
>information intended only for the person(s) named.
>Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
>by another person is strictly prohibited.
>*****************************************************
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:50:12 PST