Lydia Wilson wrote:
> Has anyone seen anything, or know intuitively how the new Federal
> Supplement 2d should be cited. West Publishing is saying that the courts
> are citing it as F.Supp.2d, but we have been thinking that it might be
> F.Supp. 2d or F. Supp. 2d
>
> What does veryone think:
> F.Supp.2d
> F.Supp. 2d
> F. Supp. 2d
>
> We need to update the dictionary component of our CompareRite, CiteRite,
> etc. and I wondered how everyone else had treated this.
>
Under Rule 6.1 of the 16th edition of the Bluebook, F. Supp. 2d is correct.
Jason R. Levine
Computer Reference Librarian
The John Marshall Law School
Chicago, IL 60604 E-Mail: 8levine@jmls.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:49:59 PST