Just an obversation. In today's mail I received five bound West reporters.
Two were "corrected" copies and one was the volume referenced below, which,
by the way, is defective. Maybe they got two right on the first try ;-)
--- On Tue, 08 Sep 1998 12:19:41 -0700 Robert Ryan <fsrkbla@earthlink.net>
wrote:
Kathie Sullivan wrote:
> Check your copies of 219 BR.
>
> My copy ends at page 874, just before the "special pages", in the middle
of
> a case that started on p. 873. ...
Mine, too. I guess they got tired of screwing up TOCs and have switched to
screwing up the actual Contents.
Has the thought "Gee, now that we've spent all this money acquiring West,
where
can we cut costs? I know - quality control! Nobody will notice cuts there."
crossed anybody else's mind, or is my innate cynicism showing? (I try to be
cynical - it keeps me from becoming bitter.)
Bob Ryan
Frandzel Share
Los Angeles
---------------End of Original Message-----------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Jane D. Burke, Law Librarian
Connecticut Judicial Branch
Law Library at New London
Courthouse, 70 Huntington Street
New London, CT 06320
(860) 442-7561
(860) 442-9416 (FAX)
E-mail: Jane.Burke@po.state.ct.us
Date: 09/08/98 Time: 16:18:25
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:49:57 PST