Re: Baker & McKenzie

From: Alvin Podboy (podskius@ohionet.org)
Date: Thu Apr 24 1997 - 07:30:06 PDT


Cindy, Hmmmmmmm. I wonder if there is any discrimination suit
implications. Language is a wonderful thing, as is history. I remain Al
of Cleveland.

On Wed, 23 Apr 1997, Cindy Chick wrote:

>
> It appears that Baker & McKenzie is having a difficult time admitting
> that they do in fact, need a librarian, even though they've hired one.
> Take a look at "Librarian is Needed", The National Law Journal, April 28,
> 1997, p. A4. According to Cynthia Morris, the librarian they hired is
> "not a librarian". "That is to say, Ms Schmid does not replace the
> librarians whose jobs were outsourced, explains Ms. Morris. Instead, Ms
> Schmid will 'assist with online services as well as manage the library's
> hard-copy resources,' which, as Wendy Leibowitz, the author of the
> article adds, "are also known as books." Good one. :-)
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Cindy Chick cchick@netcom.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:49:33 PST