Re: ("J" Strikes again)

From: Lawstuff@aol.com
Date: Tue Jul 30 1996 - 06:31:52 PDT

Next message: Linda Kawaguchi: "Q: For Academic Law Libraries"
Previous message: Anne Kirkhope: "Needed: 1969 Wage & Hour Opinion"
Next in thread: Gary Morgan: "Re: ("J" Strikes again)"
Reply: Gary Morgan: "Re: ("J" Strikes again)"
Maybe reply: Brian Smith: "Re: ("J" Strikes again)"
Reply: Kay Collins: "Re: ("J" Strikes again)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In a message dated 96-07-29 16:15:35 EDT, arnstein@mcs.net (Frank Drake)
writes:

<< On a less happy note, "J" has struck again >>
But the real question is: Why do they continue to use "J?" Must be some
magic in that initial.

Rodger

Next message: Linda Kawaguchi: "Q: For Academic Law Libraries"
Previous message: Anne Kirkhope: "Needed: 1969 Wage & Hour Opinion"
Next in thread: Gary Morgan: "Re: ("J" Strikes again)"
Reply: Gary Morgan: "Re: ("J" Strikes again)"
Maybe reply: Brian Smith: "Re: ("J" Strikes again)"
Reply: Kay Collins: "Re: ("J" Strikes again)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:49:15 PST