Re: 67 F3d 1021

From: Kay G. Collins (kcollins@netcom.com)
Date: Thu Dec 21 1995 - 05:42:47 PST


Jerry--

Your reply reminded me of an opinion I heard about years ago. I THINK it
was somewhere in the 7th Circuit: an opinion written in rhyme.

Over the years, I have tried unsuccessfully to locate the case. I
thought it was mentioned in the Q&A section of _LLJ_, along with other
amusing cases, but I've gone thru back issues and can't find it. If
anyone can identify this, I would really appreciate it.

I wanted to use these some of them in the library orientation course I
used to teach for new hearings officers. It was a
seek-and-ye-shall-find exercise.

For example, my favorite ALR annotation deals with a case of an individual
who maintained his right to use marijuana because it was part of his
church ceremony. As I recall, he said that if Native Americans could use
peyote, he could smoke grass. I'm at home, so don't have the cite. But
it's a great example of ALR taking a seemingly insignificant case to
annotate. The hearings officers got a good laugh AND learned about
ALR.

--Kay Collins (furloughed) Head Librarian US Railroad Retirement Board
    Chicago

On Wed, 20 Dec 1995, Jerry Stephens wrote (in pertinent part):

> RE: In re Thinking Machines Corp., 67 F3d 1021
>
> One suggestion here, and you've apparently begun to do some
> of that already. The frequent reader of judicial opinions
> can come up with many examples of creative writing. Judge
> Selya is only of
> the better writers in this regard.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:49:03 PST