Antje <Antje.Mays@Citadel.edu> wrote:
>Last I heard, the library is
>now polarised -- one school of thought is that it is inappropriate
>to purchase
>things from the shop owned by one's employees.....
>Folks, _I_ side with the f i r s t camp. But it seems that such >ethics
is unwritten, that no specific laws govern such transaction >scenarios.
>
>Now, my advice to the purchasing department head is to say to hexx with it and
>go work in a sane environment where standards & guidelines are clear-cut. But
>I feel shallow in knowing nothing tangible regarding the actual legality or
>illegitimacy of such transactions.
>>What does the wisdom of law-lib say?
The more important question here is whether you want to get involved in
a feud, which your posting seems to suggest by the use of the word
"polarized".
My advice is: stay out of either camp. I've personally
worked in a public library where people spent most of their time wrangling
about stuff that could not be changed and for which they were not responsible.
It was a most unhappy place to work.
Let the director or whoever is reponsible worry about this...that's what
they are being paid to do.
Why get involved in a feud that potentially could hurt you later?
Consider the consequences if someone in the *second*
camp suddenly becomes your boss!
Strong advice for us busybody librarians, but an option worth considering.
Janet Stevenson
ABB Environmental
Birmingham, Alabama
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:49:00 PST