[LAW-LIB:56584] Natural Life Cycle of a Mailing List

From: Jim Milles (jgmilles@buffalo.edu)
Date: Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:13:04 PDT

  • Next message: Cocuzzi, Anthony: "[LAW-LIB:56585] Need article in today's LA Daily Journal"

    Now might be as good a time as any to post this classic from the dawn of the
    Internet:

    *Originally Posted to Gleason Sackman's
    Net-Happenings<http://scout.cs.wisc.edu/scout/net-hap/index.html>
    > *
    >
    > Date: Wed, 5 Apr 1995 07:07:16 -0600
    > From: Mike Gurstein <mikeg@nywork2.undp.org>
    > To: Multiple recipients of list <futurework@csf.colorado.edu>
    > Subject: Fwd: Life cycle of Lists (fwd)
    > ---------------------
    > Forwarded message:
    > From: mforster@findhorn.org (Michael Forster)
    > To: communitarians@civic.net
    > Date: 95-03-31 07:57:23 EST
    >
    > This seemed like a good time to post this item from the Humor List.
    > Michael Forster
    >
    > THE NATURAL LIFE CYCLE OF MAILING LISTS
    >
    > Every list seems to go through the same cycle:
    >
    > 1. Initial enthusiasm (people introduce themselves, and gush a lot about
    > how wonderful it is to find kindred souls).
    >
    > 2. Evangelism (people moan about how few folks are posting to the list, and
    > brainstorm recruitment strategies).
    >
    > 3. Growth (more and more people join, more and more lengthy threads
    > develop, occasional off-topic threads pop up)
    >
    > 4. Community (lots of threads, some more relevant than others; lots of
    > information and advice is exchanged; experts help other
    > experts as well as less experienced colleagues; friendships develop; people
    > tease each other; newcomers are welcomed with
    > generosity and patience; everyone---newbie and expert alike---feels
    > comfortable asking questions, suggesting answers, and
    > sharing opinions)
    >
    > 5. Discomfort with diversity (the number of messages increases
    > dramatically; not every thread is fascinating to every
    > reader; people start complaining about the signal-to-noise ratio; person 1
    > threatens to quit if *other* people don't
    > limit discussion to person 1's pet topic; person 2 agrees with person 1;
    > person 3 tells 1 & 2 to lighten up; more
    > bandwidth is wasted complaining about off-topic threads than is used for
    > the threads themselves; everyone gets
    > annoyed)
    >
    > 6a. Smug complacency and stagnation (the purists flame everyone who asks an
    > 'old' question or responds with humor to a serious post; newbies are
    > rebuffed; traffic drops to a doze-producing level of a few minor issues; all
    > interesting discussions happen by private email and are limited to a few
    > participants; the purists spend lots of time self-righteously congratulating
    >
    > each other on keeping off-topic threads off the list)
    >
    > OR
    >
    > 6b. Maturity (a few people quit in a huff; the rest of the participants
    > stay near stage 4, with stage 5 popping up briefly
    > every few weeks; many people wear out their second or third 'delete' key,
    > but the list lives contentedly ever after)
    >

    -- 
    Jim Milles
    Vice Dean for Legal Information Services and Director of the Law Library
    Professor of Law
    University at Buffalo Law School
    208 O'Brian Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
    (716) 645-2089, jgmilles@buffalo.edu
    http://ClaimID.com/jmilles
    http://www.retaggr.com/Card/jmilles
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:14:27 PDT