How the hell can she(Palin)only want to promote abstinence-only
approaches in school, when obviously her daughter was having premarital
sex. Regardless of whether or not her 17 year old daughter is engaged
(probably by force), the fact still remains that her 17 year old
daughter is a teen parent and her stand is contradictory.
I also would never describe myself a pitbull with lipstick. Very
unattractive!
Strong woman? perhaps.
Why assume OR take it for granted that all the women who didn't get
Hilary are now going to vote for Palin?
Palin reminds me of Anita Bryant and she is and was as scary as they
come.
Just my opinion of course.
Sybil Ward
Library Clerk
Dechert, LLP
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-6797
212.698.3632
212.698.3599 Fax
sybil.ward@dechert.com
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:06 AM
To:
Subject: [LAW-LIB:56562] RE: Sarah Palin and Libraries
Censorship, Censorship! The sky is falling, the sky is falling!
The predictable hysterics of Leftist librarians aside, well, there was
nothing "censored" here at all.
It seems pretty clear that this particular little attempt to go after
Palin has absolutely nothing behind it. All one has to do is read the
Anchorage Daily News piece on it to see:
1) The librarian and Palin were both political operatives on different
sides of the fence. Palin was coming off a stiff fight with her
political opponent, an opponent who the librarian backed.
2) Palin wanted to get rid of the librarian (no surprise there), as
she did with other holdovers from the former administration (no
surprise there either, as that is what happens when administrations
change)
3) The chairwoman of the Alaska Library Association says nothing
showed up on her radar.
4) And finally, Anne Kilkenny wants to be famous.
Move along, nothing to see here, except the extent to which liberals
desperately fear and resent a strong independent woman. But that's not
exactly news either...
http://www.adn.com/politics/story/515512.html
-- Leslie Germaine Solo Practitioner Practicing WorldwideOn Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Stephanie Huthmacher <shuthmacher@lglaw.com> wrote: > I don't believe censorship is a political issue. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-law-lib@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-law-lib@ucdavis.edu] On > Behalf Of Kevin Shelton > Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 10:02 AM > To: law-lib@ucdavis.edu > Subject: [LAW-LIB:56556] RE: Sarah Palin and Libraries > > While it may be impossible to declare any unmoderated listserv a > "politics-free zone", it is an admirable desideratum to try to keep this > one so, in my opinion. Perhaps that is one measure of adulthood? > > > Kevin Shelton > > Reference Librarian > Barbara and Maurice A. Deane Law Library > Hofstra University School of Law > 122 Hofstra University > Hempstead, New York 11549-1220 > Telephone: (516) 463-6150 > Fax: (516) 463-5129 > E-mail: lawkbs@hofstra.edu > > >>>> "Jim Milles" <jgmilles@buffalo.edu> 9/4/2008 5:09 PM >>> > *sigh* > > This "issue" comes up every election year... > > We're all professionals here, and we're all adults. We may disagree, > but > over the years we've generally disagreed in a civil fashion. Politics > is > important, and this election in particular presents a very clear > choice--if > you don't think so, no matter which side you come down on, you haven't > been > paying attention. Trying to declare this listserv a politics-free zone > is > both pointless and misguided. > > Jim Milles > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Stephanie Huthmacher > <shuthmacher@lglaw.com>wrote: > >> Spoken like a true member of the legal profession... >> >> >> >> I, too, am a legal librarian. I find the banning of books repulsive > and >> any intrusion into ones personal library records abhorrent. >> >> Perhaps if parents were to talk to their children, or pop their heads > into >> their rooms once in a while, they could get an idea on what the kids > are >> doing, rather than relying on the librarian to monitor behavior. >> >> >> >> If you don't like a book, don't read it - if you don't like a > movie, don't >> watch it. No one holds a gun to anyone's heading forcing them to do >> anything they find offensive. Time to take responsibility for your > own >> actions without impinging on the rights of others... >> >> >> >> >> >> Stephanie N. Huthmacher, MLS >> >> 42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 >> >> Buffalo, New York 14202-3924 >> >> Phone: 716.849.1333 ext. 330 >> >> Fax: 716.855.1580 >> >> E-mail: shuthmacher@lglaw.com >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* owner-law-lib@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-law-lib@ucdavis.edu] > *On >> Behalf Of *Frye, Nanna >> *Sent:* Thursday, September 04, 2008 4:42 PM >> *To:* Library; law-lib@ucdavis.edu >> *Subject:* [LAW-LIB:56539] RE: Sarah Palin and Libraries >> >> >> >> Ah, but you did inject partisan politics into it, Paula, by the > manner >> in which you related these facts. Is anyone in doubt as to your > position on >> Sarah Palin after reading your posting? You certainly did not supply > both >> sides of the story. Reasonable minds could differ on the legislation > you >> mentioned below on whether parents could learn about the books their >> children are borrowing from a library. If your teenage child has > been moody >> and you discover a library book on suicide in the teenager's room, > shouldn't >> you be able to find out if the child had borrowed other books on > suicide? >> Many would say "yes." Was the censoring a blanket act that applied > to >> adults and children or just to children? Are we talking about > literary >> books or titillating junk novellas that Palin wanted to censor? > Again, we >> don't have both sides of the story. After many, many years of > working for a >> court, it is very rare when there are not two sides to a story. >> >> >> >> I will reserve judgment until I have ALL of the facts. I would > prefer >> that we avoid political postings on law-lib about the presidential > election >> even if they do allegedly deal with "library topics." >> >> Nanna Frye, Law Librarian >> Court of Appeal >> San Diego, CA >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* owner-law-lib@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-law-lib@ucdavis.edu] > *On >> Behalf Of *Library >> *Sent:* Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:54 AM >> *To:* law-lib@ucdavis.edu >> *Subject:* [LAW-LIB:56536] Sarah Palin and Libraries >> >> I know this isn't the place for partisan politics and I'm not going > to >> discuss what I think of Sarah Palin's positions on abortion or > foreign >> policy or whether polar bears belong on the Endangered Species Act. > But she >> did try to censor books in the Wasilla Public Library and she did try > to >> fire the librarian for not agreeing to do so. And she did support a > bill in >> the legislature that would have forced librarians to tell parents > what books >> their children had checked out of the library. >> >> I thought, as librarians, you might want to know her position on > libraries >> and censorship. >> There is a well documented anti-Palin librarian's web site that > discusses >> this. issues:http://librariansagainstpalin.wordpress.com/ >> >> Paula Lichtenberg, Librarian >> Keker & Van Nest LLP, San Francisco >> > > > > -- > Jim Milles > Vice Dean for Legal Information Services and Director of the Law > Library > Professor of Law > University at Buffalo Law School > 208 O'Brian Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260 > (716) 645-2089, jgmilles@buffalo.edu > http://ClaimID.com/jmilles > http://www.retaggr.com/Card/jmilles > >
This e-mail is from Dechert LLP, a law firm, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or distribute the e-mail or any attachments. Instead, please notify the sender and delete the e-mail and any attachments. Thank you.
Please consider the environment by not printing this email.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 05 2008 - 08:37:12 PDT