[LAW-LIB:55175] MEDICAL RECORDS : INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: Uniform IT Definitions Proposed to Promote Understanding

From: David P. Dillard (jwne@temple.edu)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2008 - 22:03:56 PDT

  • Next message: Quinn, Ellen: "[LAW-LIB:55176] Corporate Counsel 2007 Almanac - special issue"

    MEDICAL RECORDS :
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY:
    Uniform IT Definitions Proposed to Promote Understanding

    Uniform IT Definitions Proposed to Promote Understanding
    The definitions distinguish electronic health records, which include
    information from multiple facilities, from electronic medical records,
    which would be from a single entity.
    By Dave Hansen, AMNews staff. April 7, 2008.
    American Medical News
    <http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2008/04/07/gvsc0407.htm>

    Washington -- The jumble of terms in health information technology soon
    could be simplified. The National Alliance for Health Information
    Technology announced March 24 that it finished proposed definitions for
    five key HIT terms and will seek public comment on them until April 9.

    The alliance, a nonprofit organization serving as a forum for companies
    and officials to debate emerging HIT issues, started its work in November
    2007 for the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information
    Technology. The terms are electronic medical record, electronic health
    record, personal health record, health information exchange and regional
    health information organization.

    The ONC chose the terms because they are the most often confused.
    Lawmakers have proposed bills that use the terms in different ways, said
    Karen M. Bell, MD, director of the ONC's Office of HIT Adoption.

    After the definitions are finalized, the ONC will officially adopt them
    and use them in its contract language, said alliance Vice President and
    Chief Marketing Officer Jane Horowitz, who leads the project.
    Organizations and companies should follow and operationalize the
    definitions throughout health care, she said.

    One of the most significant developments would be distinguishing EMRs from
    EHRs. The two are frequently used interchangeably. The alliance proposed
    identifying an EMR as medical information on an individual patient from a
    single organization, including affiliated settings. EHRs would be data on
    a patient aggregated from multiple organizations.

    ------------------------------------------

    The complete article may be read at the URL above.

    Also of possible interest:

    REFERENCE: ENCYCLOPEDIAS:
    Researching and Learning with The Wikipedia
    <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Net-Gold/message/22913>

    Sincerely,
    David Dillard
    Temple University
    (215) 204 - 4584
    jwne@temple.edu
    Net-Gold
    <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/net-gold>
    <http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/net-gold.html>
    <http://groups.google.com/group/net-gold?hl=en>
    <http://net-gold.jiglu.com/>
    General Internet & Print Resources
    <http://guides.temple.edu/general-internet>
    <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Net-Gold/message/20309>
    <http://www.edu-cyberpg.com/ringleaders/davidd.html>
    Educator-Gold
    <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Educator-Gold/>
    K12ADMINLIFE
    <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/K12AdminLIFE/>
    Nina Dillard's Photographs on Net-Gold
    <http://tinyurl.com/36qd2o>
    Net-Gold Membership Required to View Photos



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 30 2008 - 22:11:06 PDT