RE: Flat-rate contracts (Wexis) and confidentiality clauses

From: Graesser, Christine L. (CGraesser@brownrudnick.com)
Date: Fri Jun 01 2007 - 07:53:46 PDT


Ah, the emperor has no clothes - what would Wexis do if we actually said "no"?
 
Chris Graesser

  _____

From: owner-law-lib@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-law-lib@ucdavis.edu] On Behalf Of Gaunce, Charles
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 10:25 AM
To: Law-lib
Subject: RE: Flat-rate contracts (Wexis) and confidentiality clauses

As is usual, I don't get paid a whole lot to think about these things, but can't these be considered as a combination in restraint of trade in which the victim (the law firm) is a co-conspirator? See, 15 U.S.C. §1 (or for the more ironically inclined 15 U.S.C.A. §1 or 15 U.S.C.S. §1).

 

Chas. Gaunce

University of Texas at El Paso

 

  _____

From: owner-law-lib@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-law-lib@ucdavis.edu] On Behalf Of dl
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 8:41 AM
To: law-lib to post
Subject: Flat-rate contracts (Wexis) and confidentiality clauses

 

Has anyone whose been involved in the negotation of flat rate contracts with Westlaw or Lexis ever sought to remove or alter the confidentialty clause?

 

This clause seems to benefit only Wexis and works to the detriment of law firms or other subscribers to these kinds of deals.

 

We are currently in the final stages of renewing our contract and this clause is the lone remaining bone of contention. My feeling is that the trend will be away from these clauses, but wanted to see what other people think.

 

 

 

David Leone

Librarian

Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP

511 Union Street, Suite 2700

Nashville, Tennessee 37219

Phone: 615-850-8144

Fax: 615-244-6804

Email: dleone@wallerlaw.com

-------------------------------------------------

The information contained in this message and any attachments is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or using the information. Please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the original message from your system.

  

  _____

Pinpoint customers <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48250/*http:/searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v9.php?o=US2226&cmp=Yahoo&ctv=AprNI&s=Y&s2=EM&b=50> who are looking for what you sell.

***********************************************************************************
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice, we inform you that:
Any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) was not written to be used for and cannot be used for (i) purposes of avoiding any tax related penalties that may be imposed under Federal tax laws, or (ii) the promotion, marketing or recommending to another party of any transaction or matter addressed herein.
The information contained in this electronic message may be legally privileged and confidential under applicable law, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the recipient of this message is not the above-named intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels, LLP, (617) 856-8200 (if dialing from outside the US, 001-617-856-8200) and purge the communication immediately without making any copy or distribution.
***********************************************************************************
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper to enhance content security.
www.mimesweeper.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:46:56 PST