FOUND!! Rule of Saunders v Vautier

• Next message: Cullmann, Renee A.: "A question for California librarians"
• Previous message: Zimmerman, Stuart: "RE: West: has anyone contacted CRIV or West librarian relations?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Many, many thanks to Brian Boyle and Danielle Brosseau

I heart this list.

-mp

On 1/30/07, M. Parker <parkermd2@gmail.com> wrote:

> Saunders v Vautier, (1841) 4 Beav 115 or 1841 English Chancery Division
> decision *Saunders v. Vautier *(1841), 41 E.R. 482
>
> Where oh, where can I find this? Wexis is useless, usual avenues stop
> short at 1865. Help is much appreciated and gratefully acknowledged.
>
>
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Melody D. Parker, MM, MLIS
> Research and Collection Development Coordinator
> Greenberg Traurig, LLP
> The Forum
> 3290 Northside Parkway, Suite 400
> Atlanta, GA 30327
>
>
>

• Next message: Cullmann, Renee A.: "A question for California librarians"
• Previous message: Zimmerman, Stuart: "RE: West: has anyone contacted CRIV or West librarian relations?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:46:50 PST