This has been so confusing!
This bill was not signed by the govenor because it was vetoed!
>>> library 8/18/2004 1:50:48 PM >>>
OK - I got it.
If anyone would like the reference it is from the 2003-2004 California
session - AB 274. It has been enrolled, but not signed by the govenor.
Thanks for all of the help!!
Cynthia
>>> "library" <library@joneswaldo.com> 8/18/2004 1:39:11 PM >>>
I have looked everywhere! and I need some help.
The attorney said he saw somewhere....that there is a new provision in
California law that says if any adverse employment action is taken
against an employee within 60 days of that employee reporting the
employer (i.e. whistleblower) then the action will be assumed to be
retaliatory.
I have searched lexis, westlaw, the California legislative portal, and
the BNA Labor library - and I can't find anything. I think the attorney
say it from an updating service like BNA or CCH.
Any information would be GREATLY appreciated.
Thank you!
Cynthia
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:45:40 PST