***Is everyone else getting these SpamAssassin
reports from the server at UCD? To me it means
that the software is interfering with postings
because of an email alias, the font, etc.
As this is a restricted mailing list, can UCD
please turn off or otherwise adjust some of the
settings so as not to interfere with our
postings? I am copying Judy Janes in hopes
that we can deal with this directly.
Or am I misunderstanding something in the
message from Beth Smith to LawLib as I
received it below? Thanks.
All the best,
Bill
-- J. William Draper e: bdraper@law.upenn.edu Reference Librarian v: 215.898.3059 Biddle Law Library f: 215.898.6619 University of Pennsylvania 3460 Chestnut Street Philadelphia PA 19104-3406Beth.Smith@asu.edu wrote: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This incoming message has been identified by the UCD central filters as > possible spam. This attachment is provided so that you can review the > reasons the message was tagged, and to assist with additional filtering > if you wish to supplement the central filters with your own local rules. > > If you have further questions please email ithelp@ucdavis.edu for > assistance. > > Content analysis details: (7.2 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > 0.3 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name > 0.0 HTML_80_90 BODY: Message is 80% to 90% HTML > 0.2 HTML_FONT_FACE_ODD BODY: HTML font face is not a commonly used face > 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts > 0.2 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > 1.3 WEIRD_PORT URI: Uses non-standard port number for HTTP > 0.4 NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL > 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format > 3.0 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:45:29 PST