Re: Academic law libraries - Reporters

From: Nicholas A. Worthington (nworthingto@sonnenschein.com)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 10:35:07 PST


Further comments re: "Real Practice".

I hear time & time again from attorneys who state that they can determine a
case's value more quickly, and at less cost, by looking at the head notes
in the books than by going on line. In "Real Practice" time is money.
What will the new associate do when a Partner tells them not to use
electronic services on a project due to cost concerns?

An other "Real Practice" issue is reliability of electronic access. What
does the attorney do when access is down and they are on a tight deadline
for a filing?

To fully prepare students for the world of "Real Practice", they need to
know how to use both the electronic and paper versions efficiently.

Nick Worthington
Librarian
Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal
San Francisco Library
415.882.1005

                                                                                                           
                      "Laura E. Ray"
                      <laura.ray@law.cs To: "Felice K. Lowell"
                      uohio.edu> <felice.lowell@law.csuohio.edu>
                      Sent by: cc: Cynthia Aninao <aninaocf@law.uc.edu>,
                      owner-law-lib@ucd "law-lib@ucdavis.edu" <law-lib@ucdavis.edu>
                      avis.edu Subject: Re: Academic law libraries - Reporters
                                                                                                           
                                                                                                           
                      03/14/2003 08:12
                      AM
                                                                                                           
                                                                                                           

Aside from ABA requirements, retention of print materials influences
teaching. Do law schools still need to teach print research? Does an
understanding of print materials help one to be a better electronic
researcher?
Another issue concerns real practice. How many practitioners do not, or
will not, have access to computers, and thus need, or will need, to know
how to do print research? One might say that an attorney without access to
computers is likely to be in danger of malpractice (eg, because of not
having access to electronic Shepards). Yet how important are computers
for the everyday practitioner who deals with nuts-and-bolts wills,
dissolutions, etc.? Can an attorney survive in real practice -- with
sufficient billings to make a living -- without access to computers? Are
electronic research and materials forcing a permanent change in the
profession?
Then there is the issue of information access. By eliminating paper,
would law schools contribute to the potential situation of only those with
access to computers being capable of practicing law? The 2000 Census tells
us slightly over half of US households have computers, but that means
slightly under half of US households do not have computers. [And you
guessed it. Hispanic-Americans and African-Americans prevail in the
numbers of households without computers. What impact does this have?] If
law-related information was only available electronically, how might this
contribute to the widening gap between those with access to information and
those without such access? Do law libraries, particularly state law school
libraries, have a public responsibility to retain print collections?
Laura

"Felice K. Lowell" wrote:
      Actually Cynthia, we are talking about that. If the info is
      available on Westlaw and all students and faculty have access to it
      what is the problem? The only paper sacrosanct as far as our
      reference staff is concerned is codes, etc. The rest is taking up a
      lot of space, gets less use each semester, costs an arm and a leg,
      takes endless processing, and decimates a forest daily. As academic
      institutions, our first priority is our students and faculty (or vice
      versa!)
      1. Can we afford to support users beyond our immediate
      responsibility.
      2. Is there a better way to insure "ownership" of the information
      than have everyone save the same paper copy?
      3. Is elimination of hard copy going to impact library statistics
      title/volume count? (check all of the government documents which are
      no longer coming in paper, CD, or microform).

      To be honest, this memo was sent to spark some conversations on the
      topic. And we may only be talking about multiple copies, when all
      is said and done!

      Felice

      Cynthia Aninao wrote:
            Felice, let us know what you find. You're not talking about
            reporters
            that are "required" by the ABA, such as F3d, etc? How are you
            going to
            deal with that? Cynthia.

            Cynthia Aninao, Acquisitions Librarian
            University of Cincinnati Law Library
            Clifton and Calhoun Streets
            Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0142

            cynthia.aninao@law.uc.edu
            513-556-0156, Fax 513-556-6265

            On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Felice K. Lowell wrote:

                  Now that there have been several "surveys" on the
                  acquisition of hard
                  copy for Shepard's and digests, we'd like to know
                  whether any academic
                  law libraries have begun to evaluate their reporter
                  subscriptions with
                  the thought of relying solely on electronic access. We
                  know there are
                  some law firms doing just that. It seems a little
                  radical for us, but
                  budget issues are forcing us to be more creative than we
                  have been in
                  the past!!

                  Thanx for your input.

                  Felice Lowell
                  Asst. Director for Technical Services
                  Cleveland State University Law Library
                  216-523-7388

            (See attached file: laura.ray.vcf)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected
by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any
attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete
this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.

SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL
Visit us on the web at http://www.sonnenschein.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------





This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:44:27 PST