Pacific digest begining 367 P.2d : to keep or not to keep

• Next message: Bronnenkant, Rita: "(Newby v. Enron Corp.), S.D. Tex., No. MDL-1466, 12/20/02."
• Previous message: Mimi Greenwood: "J of S Corporation Taxation article - thanks to Ellen Mahar!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

What with limited space and the rapid expension of Pacific Digest Beginning at 585 P.2d, I was wondering whether I should keep the B. 367 set or not.

Thoughts / experience to share people?

Thanks.

Becky Wentz
Librarian
Lukins & Annis p.s.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses
and dangerous content by Lukins & Annis, P.S.
NOTICE: This email may contain confidential or
privileged material, and is intended solely
for use by the above referenced recipient. Any 
review, copying, printing, disclosure, distri-
bution, or any other use, is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the recipient, and believe that
you have received this in error, please notify
the sender and delete the copy you received. 
Thank You!

• Next message: Bronnenkant, Rita: "(Newby v. Enron Corp.), S.D. Tex., No. MDL-1466, 12/20/02."
• Previous message: Mimi Greenwood: "J of S Corporation Taxation article - thanks to Ellen Mahar!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:44:25 PST