> Can you summarize for the list? I'd be interested
> in the answer to this.
I've had a few people ask my to summarize, so here it
goes:
Maybe.
Because the Digests are not cumulative, they are still
useful for researching cases from before 1985.
Ultimately it comes down to three things: usage, shelf
space, & sentimentality. If you find that they are
rarely used and/or take up more space than you can
spare, then by all means toss them.
However, if the attorneys want to keep them, then keep
them.
In our particular case, our 2d's & 3d's do not get
used, and since we need all the shelf space we can get
for the Federal Appendix, we've decided to discard
ours.
Thanks to everyone who responded!
Chris
=====
Me? I'm a shrill czar!
http://www.lemurlove.com/
"Some say the world will end in fire, some say in ice. I bet you anything no one saw a thirty-three mile wide piece of Pez coming."
- Matthew W. Rossi
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:36:32 PST