Deaf-related law review articles - updated

From: Mike Yared (mike_yared@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Apr 30 2002 - 07:24:00 PDT


(compiled from Index to Legal Periodicals and Current
Law Index)

General:
Tucker, Bonnie. Deafness--Disability or Subculture:
the emerging conflict.
3 Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 265-275
(Spring 1994).

Deaf education:
Anderson, Lisa A. Constitutional law--first
amendment--providing sign language interpreter
services pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act to a student attending a religious
institution does not violate the establishment clause,
nor does the establishment clause lay down an absolute
barrier to placing a public employee in a sectarian
school.
72 University of Detroit Mercy Law Review 473-487
(Winter 1995).

Brusky, Amy Elizabeth. Making Decisions for Deaf
Children Regarding Cochlear Implants: the legal
ramifications of recognizing deafness as a culture
rather than a disability.
Wisconsin Law Review 235-270 (1995).
                      
DuBow, Sy. Into the Turbulent Mainstream: a legal
perspective on the weight to be given to the least
restrictive environment in placement decisions for
deaf children.
18 Journal of Law & Education 215-228 (Spring 1989).

Huefner, Dixie Snow and Steven F. Huefner. Publicly
Financed Interpreter Services for Parochial School
Students with IDEA-B Disabilities.
21 Journal of Law & Education 223 (Spring 1992).

Humphrey, Isabel. Establishment Clause prohibits
provision of state-paid sign language interpreter to
student attending pervasively religious high school:
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District, 963
F.2d 1190 (1992).
25 Arizona State Law Journal 449-459 (Summer 1993).
                      
Ivers, Kathryn. Towards a Bilingual Education Policy
in the Mainstreaming of Deaf Children.
26 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 439-482 (Winter
1995).

Large. Special Problems of the Deaf Under the
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975.
58 Washington University Law Quarterly 213 (1980).
                      
Liu, Andy. Full Inclusion and Deaf
Education--Redefining Equality.
24 Journal of Law & Education 241-266 (Spring 1995).

Natapoff, Alexandra. Anatomy of a Debate:
intersectionality and equality for deaf children from
non-English speaking homes.
24 Journal of Law & Education 271-278 (Spring 1995).

Shaw, Suzanne. What's Appropriate? Finding a voice for
deaf children and their parents in the Education for
All Handicapped Children Act.
14 The University of Puget Sound Law Review 351-382
(Winter 1991).

Swygert, Jacob C. Constitutional law--establishment
clause--state funding of sign language interpreter for
deaf student attending parochial secondary school does
not violate first amendment. Zobrest v. Catalina
Foothills School District, 113 S. Ct. 2462 (1993).
24 Cumberland Law Review 587-599 (1993/1994).
                      
Interpreter services for deaf college student ordered
under Title I of Rehabilitation Act.
5 Mental & Physical Disability Law Reporter 410-411
(November-December 1981).

Captioning
Dubow, Sy. The Television Decoder Circuitry Act -- TV
for All.
64 Temple Law Review 609-618 (Summer 1991).

Heldman, Julie. Television and the Hearing Impaired.
34 Federal Communications Law Journal 93-165 (Winter
1982).

Schwartz, Louis and Robert Woods. Public television
and the Hearing Impaired.
9 The Journal of College and University Law 1-25
(1982/1983).

Access of the Hearing-Impaired to Television
Programming.
5 Loyola Entertainment Law Journal 188-197 (1985).

Community Television of Southern California v.
Gottfried (103 S. Ct. 885): defining the role of the
television industry in serving the needs of the
hearing impaired.
19 New England Law Review 899-916 (1983/1984).

Gottfried v. FCC: the public interest standard and
broadcaster responsibility to the hearing impaired.
130 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 957-980
(April 1982).

Judicial Intervention for the Hearing Impaired: an
uneasy partnership between the Federal Communications
Commission and the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit.
31 Catholic University Law Review 699-729 (Summer
1982).

The Public Interest Standard in the Communications Act
and the Hearing Impaired: Community Television of
Southern California v. Gottfried (103 S. Ct. 885).
25 Boston College Law Review 893-918 (July 1984).

Supreme Court rejects public television's special
obligation to provide programming for deaf persons.
7 Mental Disability L. Rep. 84-85 (March-April 1983)

Legal/Law enforcement/police/court
Berko, Michele-Lee. Preserving the sixth amendment
right of the deaf criminal defendant.
97 Dickinson Law Review 101-130 (Fall 1992).

Harris, Susan R. The Hearing Impaired Advocate.
67 Judicature 95-97 (August 1983).

Harry, Bruce. A deaf sex offender.
29 Journal of Forensic Science 1140-1143 (October
1984).

Harry, Bruce. Offenders in a silent world: hearing
impairment and deafness in relation to criminality,
incompetence, and insanity.
13 American Academy of Psychiatry & Law Bulletin 85-96
(March 1985).

Gallie, Beth and Deirdre. Representing deaf clients:
what every lawyer should know.
15 Maine Bar Journal 128-EOA (April 2000).

Gardner, Elaine. Deaf victims and defendants in the
criminal justice system.
19 Clearinghouse Review 748-751 (November 1985).
                      
Lee, Stephanie Hoit. Wisconsin v. Rewolinski: do
members of the deaf community have a right to be free
from search and seizure of their TDD call?
10 Law & Inequality 187-216 (June 1992).

Lee, Randy. Equal protection and a deaf person's right

to serve as a juror.
17 New York University Review of Law and Social Change
81-117 (1989/1990).

Manson, Harold. Jury selection: the courts, the
constitution, and the deaf.
11 Pacific Law Journal 967-992 (July 1980).

McAlister, Jamie. Deaf and hard-of-hearing criminal
defendants: how you gonna get justice if you can't
talk to the judge?.
26 Arizona State Law Journal 163-200 (Spring 1994).

Relyea, Gregg. Procedural due process: a deaf
defendant's right to be heard should encompass a right
to 'hear' civil trials through interpretation.
29 Catholic University Law Review 867-890 (Summer
1980).

Sheridan, Brian D. Accommodations for the hearing
impaired in state courts.
74 The Michigan Bar Journal 396-400 (May 1995).

Shipley, Andrew E. The Deaf Witness.
14 Litigation 13-15 (Fall 1987).

Simon, Jo Anne. The use of interpreters for the deaf
and the legal community's obligation to comply with
the ADA.
8 Journal of Law and Health 155-199 (1993/1994).
                 
Smith, Deirdre M. Confronting silence: the
Constitution, deaf criminal defendants, and the right
to interpretation during trial.
46 Maine Law Review 87-150 (1994).
                      
Tucker, Bonnie. Deaf prison inmates: time to be heard.

22 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 1-71 (November
1988).

Tucker, Bonnie P. Accommodating hearing-impaired law
students and faculty members.
41 Journal of Legal Education 355-361
(September/December 1991).

Tucker, Bonnie. Mental health services for deaf
persons: proposed legislation.
Arizona State Law Journal 673-704 (Fall 1980).

Vernon, McCay and Lawrence Raifman. Recognizing and
handling problems of incompetent deaf defendants
charged with serious offenses.
20 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 373-387
(Summer 1997).

Vernon, McCay., Raifman, Lawrence J. and Greenberg,
Sheldon F. Forensic pretrial police interviews of deaf
suspects: avoiding legal pitfalls.
24 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 43-59
(January/February 2001).

Vernon, McCay, Lawrence Raifman, and Sheldon
Greenberg. The Miranda (Miranda v. Arizona, 86 S. Ct.
1602 (1966)) warnings and the deaf suspect.
14 Behavioral Sciences & the Law 121-135 (Winter
1996).

Vernon, McCay; Steinberg, Annie G.; Montoya, Louise A.
Deaf murderers: clinical and forensic issues.
17 Behavioral Sci. & L. 495-516 (Autumn 1999).

Wood, Jeffrey. Protecting deaf suspects' right to
understand criminal proceedings.
75 The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 166-197
(Spring 1984).

The Confidentiality of criminal conversations in TDD
Relay Systems,
79 California Law Review 1349-87 (October 1991).

Due process: the deaf and the blind as jurors.
17 New England Law Review 119-152 (1981/1982).

Protecting deaf suspects' right to understand criminal
proceedings.
75 The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 166-197
(Spring 1984).

Recognizing and preserving legal rights for the
hearing impaired in the courtroom.
57 Wisconsin Bar Bulletin 14-16 (November 1984).

Sign language interpreters:
Chilton, Elizabeth. Ensuring effective communication:
the duty of health care providers to supply sign
language interpreters for deaf patients.
47 Hastings Law Journal 871-910 (March 1996).

Geyer, Paul. The role of technical assistance centers
in addressing employer concerns about accommodating
workers who are deaf or hard of hearing.
50 Labor Law Journal 280-288 (Winter 1999)

Orleans & Smith. Who Should Provide Interpreters under
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973?
Journal of College and University Law 177 (1982-1983).

Rovner, Laura L. The Right to Be Heard: The Obligation
of State Courts to Pay for Interpreters for Deaf
Litigants.
2 Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 205-EOA
(Fall 1992)

Tucker, Bonnie P. Accommodating hearing-impaired law
students and faculty members.
41 Journal of Legal Education 355-361
(September/December 1991).

Telecommunications Relay Service/TTY/TTD:
Bahr, Susan J. Ease of Access to Telecommunications
Relay Service,
44 Federal Communications Bar Journal 473-490 (May
1992).

Lee, Stephanie Hoit. Wisconsin v. Rewolinski: do
members of the deaf community have a right to be free
from search and seizure of their TDD call?
10 Law & Inequality 187-216 (June 1992).

Strauss, Karen & Richardson. Breaking Down the
Telephone Barrier - Relay Services on the Line.
64 Temple Law Review 583-607 (1991).
                   
The Confidentiality of criminal conversations in TDD
Relay Systems,
79 California Law Review 1349-87 (October 1991).

Burgdorf, Robert. Equal Members of the Community: The
Public Accommodations Provisions of the Americans with
Disabilities Act,
64 Temple Law Review 499 (1991).
"...the developments of the telecommunication relay
service is an accommodation to the interests of small
businesses as an alternative to requiring a place of
public accommodation to provide a Telecommunication
Device for the Deaf (TDD)..."

Books:
DuBow, Sy. Legal rights: the guide for deaf and hard
of hearing people. Gallaudet University Press, 2000.

Fallahay, John. The right to a full hearing: improving
access to the courts for people who are deaf or hard
of hearing. American Judicature Society, 2000.

Mike Yared

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:36:32 PST