Re: "depublished" cases

From: T. R. Halvorson (pastel@btigate.com)
Date: Thu May 11 2000 - 04:59:24 PDT

Next message: Carol Bean: "Re: "depublished" opinion clarification"
Previous message: Nancy Loewenberg: "Re: LAW-LIB digest 1630"
In reply to: Carol Bean: ""depublished" cases"
Next in thread: JGarr37496@aol.com: "Re: "depublished" cases"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Carol,

That case is available on FindLaw.

T. R.

Carol Bean wrote:
>
> After the discussion on pulled cases, one of the attorneys here came looking
> for the original case in the Supreme Court opinion Heckler v. Mathews, 104
> S.Ct. 1387, 465 U.S. 728. The case originated in district court in Alabama,
> but the case history is missing from Shepard's, and cannot be found in the
> Fed. Supps. Is this a case of an "unpublished" or "depublished" opinion,
> and if so, is there any way at all to get it?

-- T. R. Halvorson mailto:pastel@lyrea.com Pastel Programming Co. http://www.netins.net/showcase/trhalvorson

Author of: Law of the Super Searchers: the Online Secrets of Top Legal Researchers edited by Reva Basch, Information Today, Inc.

http://www.netins.net/showcase/trhalvorson/pubs/index.html _______________________________________________________________________

Next message: Carol Bean: "Re: "depublished" opinion clarification"
Previous message: Nancy Loewenberg: "Re: LAW-LIB digest 1630"
In reply to: Carol Bean: ""depublished" cases"
Next in thread: JGarr37496@aol.com: "Re: "depublished" cases"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2007 - 20:33:34 PST