[IAMSLIC:1856] letter to: AGU, fr: 3 @ Scripps Inst Oceanography, re: DOI citation

From: Peter Brueggeman (pbrueggeman@ucsd.edu)
Date: Thu Apr 25 2002 - 15:00:41 PDT

  • Next message: biblio@ola.icmyl.unam.mx: "[IAMSLIC:1857] REQ."

    25 April 2002

    To: Marcia McNutt, AGU President
    From: Ralph Keeling, Jeff Severinghaus, Peter Brueggeman
    CC: AGU Executive Committee, AGU Publications Committee

    Dear Marcia,

    It has recently come to our attention that, in its move towards online
    publishing, AGU has done away with sequential page numbering of journal articles
    as of January 2002. Instead, AGU is requiring articles to be cited based on a
    20-digit character string (e.g. 10.1029/2001JA001490), known as a digital object
    identifier (DOI), and disallowing current scientific practice wherein articles
    are cited by volume, issue, and page numbers.

    The cited benefits of AGU's new system include the ability to improve online
    access, the flexibility to submit videos or other multi-media materials as part
    of an article, and the ability to provide electronic links to other articles or
    pieces. The impression given by the AGU web page
    (http://www.agu.org/pubs/e_publishing/) is that the elimination of sequential
    page numbering of journal articles was necessary to provide these benefits.

    In a search of current publishing practice, however, we have come up with a
    short, admittedly incomplete, list of commercial publishers and professional
    societies who continue to use sequential page numbering of journal articles in
    their transition to online publishing: American Meteorological Society,
    American Chemical Society, American Fisheries Society, Nature, Science, American
    Institute of Physics, Elsevier, Company of Biologists, Royal Society of
    Chemistry, University of Chicago Press, Geological Society of America, Kluwer,
    Springer Verlag, Cambridge University Press. Many of these consider their
    ejournal to be the archival record, and provide active links via an HTML
    version. We were unable to find a single example, besides AGU, of a scientific
    publisher abandoning sequential page numbering of journal articles in the
    transition to online publishing. We also checked with the Director of the
    Science & Engineering Library at UCSD, who was also unable to cite any publisher
    following AGU practice. Although examples might still be found, it is clear
    that AGU's practice is out of step with general trends in online publishing.

    As an emerging industry standard, the DOI clearly fulfills an essential need in
    electronic publishing, by providing an alternative to the awkward practice of
    referring to (unstable) web addresses. Nevertheless, the way the DOI is being
    implemented by AGU, as the unique identifier of scientific articles for citation
    purposes, is apparently highly eccentric.

    Unfortunately, AGU's decision to eliminate sequential page numbering of journal
    articles and to force citations to be based solely on the DOI comes at a high
    cost:

    (1) The use of the DOI for citations creates problems in compatibility. It is
    annoying and troublesome to have two different filing or organizational systems
    in use concurrently in science: AGU and everybody else. It appears that all
    science ejournal publishers except AGU refer to their publishable units, the
    article, by volume, issue, and pagination. Although the community that commonly
    cites AGU journals may be able to adapt, problems will remain for the wider
    community that doesn't understand the AGU system and doesn't want to be
    bothered. Some may assume that AGU publications are "grey" literature or still
    "in press", since their citations look non-standard among scientific
    publications. It's naive to assume that AGU's unique system will ever be
    transparent to the scientific community at large. Many institutions' libraries
    will continue to subscribe to AGU journals in print for reasons of economy; the
    DOI is awkward for anyone accessing print collections in libraries.

    (2) The DOI carries no information about article length, which is valuable for
    many obvious reasons.

    (3) Citation based on the DOI takes up extra print space. Less than 20
    characters are typically required for indicating volume number and page range
    (e.g. "24, 1654-1675" entails 13 characters). The extra length of the DOI may
    cause the citation to spill over onto a new line, thus taking up even more
    space. The difference is probably not trivial for high-profile journals like
    Science and Nature, where space is at a premium.

    (4) The DOI strings are likely prone to transcription error because, with so
    many characters in an unbroken string, they are hard to scan by eye. We don't
    live in a perfect copy-and-paste world, and a significant percentage of people
    will be typing in these DOIs.

    In summary, the decision to eliminate sequential page numbering of journal
    articles in favor of the DOI has created many problems for AGU readers and
    authors. One might be tempted to argue that these are problems of transition
    which will be reduced once people adapt to the new system. In fact, every one
    of the problems listed above will present a continuing difficulty, which will
    only be lessened if the entire scientific journal publishing enterprise changes
    the way it cites articles to AGU's unique approach.

    We therefore request that the decision at AGU to eliminate sequential page
    numbering and to require use of the DOI for citation purposes be revisited. The
    collective practices of scientific publishers show that sequential page
    numbering for journal/articles is possible in an online world. If, for some
    reason, AGU finds sequential page numbering to be difficult, a user-friendly
    scheme co-existing with the DOI could be developed in which various
    methods/terms are used to identify and number journal articles within
    volumes/issues without the usage of sequential pagination, like fascicules,
    parts, etc. In all likelihood, an acceptable scheme exists which entails only
    minor changes to the present AGU production process.

    Sincerely,

    Ralph Keeling
    Assoc. Prof., Scripps Institution of Oceanography

    Jeff Severinghaus
    Assoc. Prof., Scripps Institution of Oceanography

    Peter Brueggeman
    Director, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Library

    =============================================================
    Peter Brueggeman, Director, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Library
    UCSD, 9500 Gilman Dr, Dept 0219, San Diego CA 92093-0219 USA
    pbrueggeman@ucsd.edu Tel 858/534-1230 Fax 858/534-5269



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 25 2002 - 15:01:24 PDT