Re: 840av


A1Burokas@aol.com
Sun, 20 Jun 1999 00:20:14 EDT


In a message dated 6/19/99 12:10:50 PM, JohnAhre@aol.com writes:

>Five year ago and 1st on
>my block I spent 4.5000 dollars on a brand new spanking 840av, (Big drives
>and ram by that date, now it looks infantile) I bought it because it was
>best
>on the block for video at that time and also because I was told, I had
>researched, and besides it had that great sticker on the box that said
>ready for Power PC upgrade, well that was a vapor sticker.

     Actually, as soon as the 8100's rolled out, the upgrade (motherboard
swap) was made available. But as the 8100/80 wasn't good for high throughput,
it wasn't useful. The throughout was improved on the 8100/100 and 110, btu
still didn't approach the solid HD throughput of the 840av- the fastest NuBus
Macintosh ever built. Not the fastest processor, but the fastest at throuwing
data across the bus, and thusly, the best data rates, and thusly, the best
looking video.
     Your choice was the best choice possible for, like, three years.
     I did my research after the 8100/110 came out. I bought an 840av just
after they were discontinued. A 32MB chip cost me $1200. It is lamentable how
expensive things were then. But it proved to be the best host for the
VideoVision Telecast.

Anthony
________
Anthony Burokas, Media Technician, IEBA Productions, Inc., Phila. PA
 + Event Video + Corporate Video + Broadcast Television Production +
          V: (215) 632-3283 + Fax: (215) 612-0663
Go to: <A HREF="http://ieba.com">IEBA.com</A> to find out more.

"Ok, so what's the speed of dark?"



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jun 19 1999 - 21:25:45 PDT