A1Burokas@aol.com
Fri, 18 Jun 1999 10:20:10 EDT
In a message dated 6/18/99 10:13:56 AM, philipmh@learndynamicmedia.com writes:
>> We've tested it down to 800x600. The frame should be an actual pixel
>>width. We found that when it was a percentage, nd the viewer's screen was
>>very small, the browser would make the left pane thinner and it would break
>>the lines weird. The left frame also has scrolling disabled, so if the
>lines
>>break, then you can't get to the bottom items.
>
>Sadly then, another site for me to avoid. I do all surfing on a Powerbook
>5300 at 640 x 480. Sites with large, fixed frame sizes, just end up on
>my
>'way too difficult to bother with' list.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri Jun 18 1999 - 07:21:58 PDT