Yes, that would be a good way to do it - we could see some of the
previous changes when we get it, which might be helpful. - Cynthia
At 8:12 AM -0700 6/13/07, Mary Larsgaard wrote:
>i was thinking the same thing:-)
>let's do that.
>
>only please do use the slightly updated
>one that i sent most recently - i took
>Kathy's and changed the date,
>took out some material at the end
>that's in the intro (collecting level, campus initials)
>
>Mary
>
>Julie Sweetkind-Singer wrote:
>>Hi, all,
>>
>>Maybe the conspectus should be sent campus to campus in rotation by
>>alphabet as we do with the meeting, leaving UCSB until the end. I
>>would suggest starting with Kathy's copy, which would then be
>>edited/changed by UC Irvine, then UCLA, etc. Would that work for
>>everyone?
>>
>>Julie
>>
>>At 01:00 PM 6/12/2007, you wrote:
>>>This is what Kathy sent to calmap,
>>>with Davis updates.
>>>
>>>Julie, you said you were probably
>>>going to have some changes.
>>>
>>>How about aiming toward August 15
>>>to get everyone's changes in?
>>>We could email around the digital file
>>>campus to campus, with SB
>>>last. Then after I've double-checked
>>>SB collection levels, I can send
>>>it on to Cynthia to place on Website??
>>>
>>>Mary
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 13 2007 - 10:22:10 PDT