Hi, all,
It seems to me that if we want to change the introduction to the
conspectus, which I read to be the document that the AUL's sign, we
should come up with very definite things that we want to say about the
atlases, increased info about digital data, and weeding/archiving.
Perhaps it's best to talk about these three things at the meeting and
try to come up with proper wording that would work, if we decide to
include them.
Julie
Quoting Mary Larsgaard <mary@library.ucsb.edu>:
> questions from the minutes;
> I've made comments after each.
>
> 4. Look at the conspectus to see if we should add more about atlases.
> - seems like a good idea. we could put that in the
> intro to the conspectus??
>
> 5. See if we need to address digital data in more detail than currently
> addressed in the conspectus.
> - it wouldn't hurt. past practice seems to be that
> info on carriers does not appear in the conspectus
> itself, only in the intro.
>
> 6. Consider whether archiving/weeding policy should be incorporated
> into the conspectus. For example, does the RLF persistence policy
> impact the agreement?
> - again, how about putting this in the intro to the Conspectus?
>
>
> Approach Jim Dooley, Head of Collection Services at Merced, to see if Merced
> wants to join UCSMLG
> - who was going to get in touch with Jim about this?
>
> Yvonne Wilson wrote:
>> I am preparing the agenda for June 15 UC/Stanford Map Librarians
>> meeting. I have reviewed the Kathy's attached minutes for the
>> December meeting and there are several Action Items that require
>> updates. Some of the Action Items may have been completed since
>> the last meeting. I have tried review my "calmap" e-mails without
>> much luck determining if all the issues have been addressed or
>> finalized. Part of the problem is Julia and I had to change e-mail
>> systems in January and sometimes it is hard to trace e-mail
>> strings. Anyway, please review the minutes and either remind me
>> that you have accomplished that task or you are still working on
>> it. There were a couple of things David was working on. Has anyone
>> assumed these tasks?
>>
>> About Item 3, the collection development policy, have all of you
>> contacted you AULs for collection development and reviewed the
>> conspectus? UCI has just hired a new Head of Collections and so
>> Julia and I will be working on introducing him to the UC/Stanford
>> Collection Development Policy for Maps etc. Please send me your
>> comments by June 4. I will be away attending meeting May 29-31.
>> So as soon as you can respond the better. Thanks.
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [CALMAP:78] Revised Minutes December 11 Mtg.
>> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:56:15 -0800
>> From: Kathy Stroud <kpstroud@ucdavis.edu>
>> To: <calmap@ucdavis.edu>
>>
>>
>>
>> Attached are the Revised minutes. I've incorporated comments from
>> Peter, Tracey, and Wendie. Did I miss anything?
>> Kathy Stroud, Map/GIS Librarian
>> Government Information and Maps
>> Peter J. Shields Library
>> 100 NW Quad
>> Davis, California 95616-5292
>> (530) 752-5248
>> -- Yvonne Wilson
>> Orange County &
>> California State Documents
>> Librarian
>> Reference Department
>> Langson Library
>> P.O. Box 19557
>> Irvine, CA 92623-9557
>> Ph: (949) 824-7362
>> FAX: (949) 824-3644
>> E-Mail: ymwilson@uci.edu
>>
>
>
> --
> Mary Lynette Larsgaard
> Director, Map Library
> Assistant Head, Map and Imagery Laboratory
> Davidson Library
> University of California, Santa Barbara
> Santa Barbara CA 93106-9010
> USA
> mary@library.ucsb.edu
> voice: 805/893-4049; 2779, reference desk
> fax: 805/893-8799
***
Julie Sweetkind-Singer
Head Librarian, GIS & Map Librarian
Branner Earth Sciences Library & Map Collections
Stanford University
650-725-1102
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 04 2007 - 18:13:05 PDT