[CALMAP:112] RE: Dibblee Maps: who gets them, who catalogs them?

From: Jane Ingalls (jingalls@stanford.edu)
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 11:56:13 PST

  • Next message: Kathy Stroud: "[CALMAP:113] Re: Dibblee Maps: who gets them, who catalogs them?"

    Our method is similar to Wendie's. We get them on standing order; we
    assign the same call number, with the
    DF number added. While awaiting cataloging (often provided by UCSC if I
    recall correctly), I put a brief record (title,
    sometimes author, DF series #) in our catalog; and then shelve them for
    public use. Periodically we review our
    "temp cat" (temporary cataloging) records, and, if there's a good record in
    oclc, we overwrite our brief record with
    the more complete entry.

                     Jane

    At 11:29 AM 3/1/2007, Wendie Helms wrote:
    >Hi Cynthia and all,
    >
    >UCR receives the Dibblee maps on standing order. Thank goodness it does
    >not come out of my small budget. Here's our survival method: We keep
    >them in envelopes in a locked room we call the Local Collection. They all
    >have the same call number with Dibblee Foundation map number at the end of
    >the number. Also, we add the bibliographic information to our in-house
    >map database (Inmagic). There's only two staff members in the Map
    >Collection, so we know where Dibblee maps are. Therefore, we wait until
    >the cataloging is available. It can be a problem if the students don't
    >look on the map database.
    >
    >Wendie
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >----------
    >From: owner-calmap@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-calmap@ucdavis.edu] On Behalf
    >Of Cynthia Jahns
    >Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 10:54 AM
    >To: UC/S Map Librarians
    >Cc: Jim O'Donnell
    >Subject: [CALMAP:108] Dibblee Maps: who gets them, who catalogs them?
    >
    >Hello all,
    >
    >You may have seen the recent email on MAPS-L, noting that the Dibblee
    >Foundation intends to release ten maps a month for the foreseeable future.
    >In addition to being a significant expense for some of us with small
    >budgets, this is a very large cataloging burden. My maps cataloger says
    >it takes about 45 minutes to do a good job of original cataloging for one
    >of these maps.
    >
    >We can wait for months to see a cataloging record appear in OCLC for these
    >maps. This leads us to ask: who receives these maps on standing order?
    >Who is cataloging them?
    >Are they a priority for your cataloger, or are you too waiting for someone
    >else to catalog some of them?
    >
    > If you do not catalog them, how do you store them (Filed by Dibblee # ?)
    > and how do you provide information to your patrons to enable them to find them?
    >
    >I'm starting this dialog in hopes of finding a solution to the large
    >backlog we have, which grows monthly. Thanks for your input and any
    >suggestions.
    >
    >Cynthia Jahns, UC Santa Cruz
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 11:57:07 PST