[CALMAP:111] Re:Dibblee Maps: who gets them, who catalogs them?

From: Linda P Newman (lnewman@unr.edu)
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 11:44:31 PST

  • Next message: Jane Ingalls: "[CALMAP:112] RE: Dibblee Maps: who gets them, who catalogs them?"

    We have a standing order and it's not the $ that concern me but the time
    in Catalog.
    I would assume GeoRef picks these all up and are searchable by Quad
    name???
    Wonder what their lag time is...Just spot checking I could not find
    #243, Geologic map of the Port Midway and Tracy Quadrangles, July 2006.

    Linda Newman
    University of Nevada Reno

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-calmap@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-calmap@ucdavis.edu] On
    Behalf Of Mary Larsgaard
    Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 11:22 AM
    To: UC/S Map Librarians
    Cc: Jim O'Donnell; milrefdesk
    Subject: [CALMAP:109] Re:Dibblee Maps: who gets them, who catalogs them?

    We get them on standing order, and
    yes, this does come to a fair amount of
    money.

    As for cataloging - I have chickened out
    on the cataloging one-by-one bit.
    We have an entry for the series as
    a whole.
    There are so many that listing
    all the quad names in (probably
    more than 1) 505 is not as
    attractive an option as it might be.
    But it would be my choice
    in contrast to doing original
    cataloging for each one.
    There are so many geologic maps
    of CA that appear only
    in geologic-map indexes such
    as http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/
    and are not separately cataloged
    in this library's online catalog,
    and the Dibblee maps are
    just another example of that.

    We file in alpha order by quad name.

    Persons seem more likely to
    search the Web (and we do
    refer them to http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ quite often)
    than this library's online catalog;
    we do have handmade indexes
    (drawn on USGS topo indexes for CA)
    for geologic maps that we use extensively.

    When persons come to or email
    MIL, they most often are interested in maps
    of a specific area but not any
    one specific map.

    Mary

    Cynthia Jahns wrote:
    > Hello all,
    >
    > You may have seen the recent email on MAPS-L, noting that the Dibblee
    > Foundation intends to release ten maps a month for the foreseeable
    > future. In addition to being a significant expense for some of us with

    > small budgets, this is a very large cataloging burden. My maps
    > cataloger says it takes about 45 minutes to do a good job of original
    > cataloging for one of these maps.
    >
    > We can wait for months to see a cataloging record appear in OCLC for
    > these maps. This leads us to ask: who receives these maps on standing
    > order?
    > Who is cataloging them?
    > Are they a priority for your cataloger, or are you too waiting for
    > someone else to catalog some of them?
    >
    > If you do/* not*/ catalog them, how do you store them (Filed by
    > Dibblee # ?) and how do you provide information to your patrons to
    > enable them to find them?
    >
    > I'm starting this dialog in hopes of finding a solution to the large
    > backlog we have, which grows monthly. Thanks for your input and any
    > suggestions.
    >
    > Cynthia Jahns, UC Santa Cruz
    >
    > 0
    >

    -- 
    Mary Lynette Larsgaard
    Director, Map Library
    Assistant Head, Map and Imagery Laboratory
    Davidson Library
    University of California, Santa Barbara
    Santa Barbara CA 93106-9010
    USA
    mary@library.ucsb.edu
    voice: 805/893-4049; 2779, reference desk
    fax: 805/893-8799
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 11:44:50 PST